this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
129 points (98.5% liked)

Linux

12991 readers
388 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FirmDistribution@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The numbers are wild. In developer benchmarks, Dirt 3 went from 110.6 FPS to 860.7 FPS, which is an impressive 678% improvement. Resident Evil 2 jumped from 26 FPS to 77 FPS. Call of Juarez went from 99.8 FPS to 224.1 FPS. Tiny Tina's Wonderlands saw gains from 130 FPS to 360 FPS.

Holy fucking shit

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Note that this is compared to vanilla. Most real users of Wine are already taking advantage of other optimizations like fsync, and will experience much more modest gains relative to this comparison point.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 2 points 21 hours ago

True. But a better base is still a better base. And this is excellent to see regardless.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 7 points 1 day ago

Those benchmarks compare Wine NTSYNC against upstream vanilla Wine, which means there's no fsync or esync either. Gamers who use fsync are not going to see such a leap in performance in most games.

If you're using lutris or proton/etc., you're probably already using esync/fsync.