this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
668 points (97.7% liked)

solarpunk memes

5876 readers
388 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 5 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Given the price of RAM and graphics cards, it is obvious that running LLM is at least somewhat limited by the amount of hardware available. So having that hardware sitting idle, except when there is too much solar power, is obviously not economically viable.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

obviously

citation needed

I'm saying this because a lot of things seem obvious at first glance, but are still incorrent. Sometimes reality behaves in unexpected ways and one actually has to check some stuff regularly instead of just assuming it.

Like, which scenario is more profitable? Use 100 chips and run them at all times, even when energy prices are high; or buy 200 chips and use them only when energy is cheap? Which scenario is cheaper? One actually has to do the maths, otherwise one cannot just know these things.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Power and grid infrastructure is a limitation that can exceed hardware availability. Musk has a datacenter with 20-something methane gas generators running throughout the day to power his mini-me sycophantic AI, Grok.

[–] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago

Illegal methane gas generators, I might add.

[–] pticrix@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Gotta admit, didn't think about that. Maybe the solution was a few guillotines all along. (This solution has its own problem tho, see the Robespierre gambit)

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Then you use taxation to change the viability. Make the non renewable energy so expensive for that usage that they're better just to shutdown.