this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
257 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

82992 readers
2725 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Interlock devices are the bare minimum if you insist on allowing people who have proven they will drive drunk to continue to drive.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I was arguing with the point of "repeatedly" being a determining factor for having to have this device. It's not reality, once is enough.

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, once is enough. Repeatedly should get you banned from driving.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago

When you consider that most people get away with a crime dozens of times at least before getting caught, then yes being caught once is enough.