this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
253 points (98.5% liked)

Political Memes

11401 readers
1467 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

«¿Cuántas naciones ha bombardeado USA desde 2001?» (Infografía: Al Jazeera)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yes, as we all know, the ongoing civil war in Afghanistan that Pakistan was deeply involved with was entirely peaceful before US intervention, Somalia and Syria (I note you use the anti-Assadist flag, lmao) likewise, we are definitely not present in Nigeria at request of the fucking Nigerian government, and our involvement post-2012 with Iraq was DEFINITELY not at request of the Iraqi government in dealing with fucking ISIS. Of course, I'm sure any number of people here would parrot critical support for ISIS under anti-imperialist grounds.

I also note that excluded is the assassination of Soleimani, presumably counted instead as an Iraqi strike since it was on Iraqi soil, even though it was an attack on a high-ranking Iranian military officer. I guess that would make Trump's warmongering too apparent.

But that might contradict the "BOTHSIDES" narrative, so we can't have any of those inconvenient facts.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Brother I like some of your posts but looking at this graph and being like “don’t give me your bOtHsIdEs, we HAD to!” is WILD.

We had to what, go in and fix all the destabilization, all the power-vacuum issues that WE caused with our meddling since WWII?

How can you look at what we have “had” to do and not think “wow, we’re the fucking bad guys”?

We are in an abusive relationship with the rest of the world. They gave us the benefit of the doubt, especially after “the Muslims” hit us that one time, but they can see our pattern for what it really is now. It’s time to come to terms with it, before we get any deeper in the shit.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social -3 points 1 day ago

Man, I am not saying we "Had to" do any of it, as I said, whether they're justified, I would say not in most cases. We did not have to do any of it, but I also won't pretend that running sorties on fucking ISIS to defend Iraq is the same as invading Iran - or pulling a drone strike on Iraqi soil without Iraqi permission, for that matter.

My point is that these largely aren't destabilization as the title suggests, and trying to pretend that they are is disingenuous at best and, considering how heavily it ignores the actual difference with Republican administrations, intentionally misleading at worst.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wonder if US/Western interference in the region could have caused or worsened any of these civil wars...