this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
90 points (100.0% liked)

news

24680 readers
758 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Shot: "Democrats need to move to the right to attract swing voters"

:::spoiler Chaser:

“He is below the lowest of the low, the ones who actually got beat in a primary,” [CNN analyst Harry Enten] said. “There is no historical analog to this. That is how unpopular John Fetterman is with Pennsylvania Democrats. There is basically no doubt in my mind that if Fetterman decides to run for re-election as a Democrat he will face a primary challenge, and it will be a very competitive one.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] regul@hexbear.net 32 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

He's just this term's Sinema/Manchin. The Dems always need a guy to take the heat for voting for the shit they want but their voters don't.

[–] BattleshipPokemon@hexbear.net 15 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

The whole things insane to me that the party just allows people to vote against what it wants, like whenever it happens in the UK the party will just immediately sideline that person and minimise any power they have and threaten them with expulsion for it (everyone but the greens exclusively uses this against MPs voting to the left of what the party wants, but like still, it wouldn't be accepted as an excuse)

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

What party wants and what it announces it wants are two different things.

[–] BattleshipPokemon@hexbear.net 1 points 8 hours ago

I know but at least they dont have the excuse of "rogue MPs" bcs anyone who goes rogue from their actual interests gets drummed out in half a heartbeat