this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2026
112 points (88.9% liked)

Privacy

47299 readers
1406 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

i've just seen a comment in a post, in this very community, saying people trust signal because of missinformation (from what i could undertand).

if this is true, then i have a few questions:

-what menssaging app should i use for secure communications? i need an app that balances simplicity and security.

-how to explain it to my friends who use signal because i recomended?

-what this means for other apps in general?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] glitching@lemmy.ml 23 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

not to shit on you specifically but I see this over and over, folks asking how to be "secure". secure against what?

if you're into this, you need to set up a "threat model" i.e. what are your threat vectors and then you build your defenses against that model. a defense against blanket surveillance doesn't handle targeted threats. a successful defense against your government doesn't preclude other nation-state actors getting at you.

like, if your threat vector is e.g. your SO "inspecting" your phone, you set up a passcode and you're safe against that threat. but, if there's a toddler going around smashing stuff, your defense isn't valid. defense against that vector is placing your phone high up. but that defense isn't effective against SO.

I am sure any messenger recommended here can be successfully red-teamed, be it design flaws, operator error, the famous wrench comic, or whathaveyou. but that doesn't mean it's ineffective in your specific case.

[โ€“] JustTesting@lemmy.hogru.ch 4 points 3 hours ago

Yes, i hate this in these kinds of discussions. It so often devolves into how you'll be safe from surveillance by world governments (spoiler: you won't be, if they really care).

And here I am, just not wanting to hand data over to giant corporations that have been proven to use it for no good.

Heck, even if there was no good actor/solution, not giving all your data to the same bad actor is already a step up.