this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
100 points (99.0% liked)

World News

54843 readers
3848 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Isn't it necessary to launch closer to the equater? Or is that not really necessary for modern rockets? They get something like a 500mph speed boost at the equator compared to Nova Scotia.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Necessary, no. Better, yes.

The more delta-v you require (so plus or minus that 500km/h) and the more payload you have, the more rocket you need. If you have fixed rocket size and/or a fixed budget, launching at high latitude translates into either less delta-v left over to go places or less payload.

There are partial or full exceptions if you're launching into certain orbits. For a mapping satellite that goes straight north/south as the Earth rotates below I would guess you might even prefer a higher-latitude launch.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

It's not necessary, just cheaper. It also depends on what orbit you want the satellite to go to and what direction the coast is facing. The extra speed you get from spinning slightly faster at the equator than at 45 deg latitude is not significant (500mph vs 25,000mph). Inclination of the orbit is way more important, since Inclination changes are VERY VERY expensive. So if you are launching geostationary satellites, like DirecTV or some other regional capability, then you want very close to the equator. If you are launching an inclined orbit, like GPS or LEO satellites like Starlink, then you can choose a location that is close in latitude to the inclination you want to hit. Or you can choose a location that has a coastal direction that allows you to aim your rocket over water at the inclination angle you want to hit.