this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
45 points (92.5% liked)

Asklemmy

53554 readers
612 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In theory of course. And please refrain from telling me why a global revolution would not work.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It would require several simultaneous grass roots movements globally rising up, or the complete collapse of the global economy.

Trump's on his way to obliterating the petrodollar ...

[โ€“] harrison_fnord@reddthat.com 7 points 1 day ago (5 children)

So how would you get those going?

[โ€“] frisbird@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago

Well, you could launch a war with Iran, for one. That's looking like a good way to destroy the global economy.

[โ€“] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

we're doing it already, climate change

[โ€“] Deme@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The global economical system with its built in assumption of infinite growth is on a collision course with the material realities of the world. So it will either change drastically, or collapse. The latter seems much more likely.

I think cracks will form and new, more local, decentralized and equitable frameworks will sprout from those cracks as people help each other, because the system can't or wont help them.

[โ€“] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is an excellent question.

[โ€“] harrison_fnord@reddthat.com -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am eager to hear your excellent answer. No thought about a better world is a wasted one, gimme gimme.

[โ€“] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am neither capable of creating international uprisings or the destruction of the machine of capitalism. I don't know why you would expect me to.

[โ€“] harrison_fnord@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But you are capable of thinking about it. That's all we are doing here.

Why don't you start by an example?

[โ€“] Temperche@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Find a common goal that catches peoples interest and is widely agreeable/acceptable but goes against current politics.

[โ€“] murmelade@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

Castrating people in the Epstein files?

[โ€“] daannii@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Many organizations with loose leadership but all with common goals.

That way taking out a leader or even cluster of the movement won't stop it but just fuel increased determination of the others.

At least that's what I heard is one way that one side can win against enemies with more tech , weapons, and troops than they.

Also. Let's not downplay guerilla tactics.

They have always been effective against a bigger enemy.