Bikini Bottom Twitter

4676 readers

281 users here now

Ahoy, me buckos! Welcome to Bikini Bottom Twitter! Your digital reef for the latest salty gossip and treasure tales! And while you're at it, be sure to drop by the Krusty Krab for a delicious Krabby Patty so I can get yer mon- err I mean, 'cause they're the best treat under the sea!

Rule 1 - This is Bikini Bottom Twitter, all posts should be Spongebob related in "(Old-School) Twitter-like" form

Rule 2 - Political posts, as long as it follows rule 1, will be permitted, so long as you behave yourselves.

Bikini Bottom Municipal Code §33-07: Anti-Tankie Ordinance Residents are prohibited from circulating tankie ideology or other authoritarian propaganda on Bikini Bottom Twitter. Offenders will be permanently banned from BPT by the BBPD faster than Plankton is ejected from The Krusty Krab.

Rule 3 - Please no reposts within the last couple days, at least

Rule 4 - All posts should be at least above a "Squirdward-krusty-krab-shift" level of effort

Rule 5 - Be chill, be a Patrick not a squidward.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

cm0002@lemmy.world

cm0002@piefed.world

297

A Whole New World (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 day ago by MinguPingu@lemmy.world to c/bikinibottomtwitter@lemmy.world

43 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sheridan@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When I first got some monitor headphones, I listened to one of my favorite classical orchestra albums, and for the first time I could hear the wood of the stage floor creaking and the score pages flipping. In a moment of silence I could hear the faint sound of birds tweeting in the distance (it was recorded it an old Italian building, a large cathedral possibly, so maybe some birds got in? Idk).

[–] tarball@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You can't just say that and not provide the album's name

[–] dontbelievethis@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Album schmalbum. Which headphones are this good?

[–] GreatBlueHeron@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago

We are spoilt these days - there are lots of options. You can get that level of resolution from $20 in ear monitors. But, if you're after that level it's not just the headphones - it's the whole chain (assuming you're listening to digital):

you need a decent DAC - again, it does not need to be expensive - a $10 Apple USB-C to 3.5mm adaptor will do it (but the built-in one in your laptop, or older phone, may not).
you need decent, or preferably no, compression. Turn up the bit-rate in whatever streaming app you're using or preferably use CD or uncompressed (FLAC).
perhaps most importantly, and most overlooked, you need good source material. Lots of music out there has been horribly recorded and/or mastered. With low quantity reproduction this isn't an issue, but once you've taken care of the rest and you're spending time really listening to your music you will find yourself from time to time thinking "this sounds horrible", and you know you've done everything at your end and it turns out you're listening to a bad master. There are forums dedicated to discussion about the relative merits of various versions of different recordings.

It's a huge rabbit hole, which stereotypicaly is very expensive - but doesn't need to be.

I've only scratched the surface, but with my old, damaged, ears there's no point digging further.

[–] sheridan@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Ah sorry. It was early music ensemble Modo Antiquo's recording of Corelli's op. 6 concerti grossi.

[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Found this on youtube. Would you mind confirming it's what you were referencing?

[–] sheridan@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

Yeah that's it. It was originally two albums (concertos 1 to 6 and 7 to 12). It's a very special recording because several of the concertos have hypothetical reconstructed parts for woodwinds and brass that are thought to be missing in the surviving manuscripts.