Agreed. I think of Wall-E often and think its vision of the future is more accurate, but Idiocracy makes for a more descriptive term to summarize it. And suddenly, I feel like I'm rehashing HS English class: "Does 1984 or Brave New World summarize society more accurately?" The premise being that in 1984, the government deliberately sought to shrink reality, whereas in "Brave New World," individuals opted-in.

My perspective is that oligarchical wannabes are essentially giving people what they think those people want, but they're clearly not following the ideas through to their logical conclusions. Like, AI in schools.... OK..... Why? Because thinking is too hard? Don't be silly -- that's what brains do reflexively. And like, when did hard stuff get such a bad rap? IMHO, so-called friction is good, probably fundamental. This notion that everything should be all upside all the time is probably not even possible, much less desirable.