this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
14 points (93.8% liked)

World News

24439 readers
133 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Thousands of pets are being abandoned in Dubai as their owners flee the Middle East because of the Iran war, animal charities have said.

The RSPCA said pets of fleeing UK nationals could become “hidden victims” of the conflict as people who had relocated to the Gulf city scramble for an exit and struggle to bring their animals.

Last week, the UK government operated an emergency evacuation flight for people leaving the Middle East as the war continued. About 45,000 British nationals have left the Middle East since 1 March.

Hannah Mainds, the chief executive of the RSPCA Blackpool and north Lancashire branch, previously lived in Dubai and helped care for pets left behind after their owners suddenly left the country.

“Some [pets] were microchipped and clearly once loved, but their families had gone. It’s heartbreaking for rescuers and frightening for the animals,” Mainds said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GooseGang@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The article doesn’t specify if they’re not able to bring them with them or why… :( 🐈 🐈‍⬛ 🐕 🐩

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 1 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Reading between the lines, the article mentioning an agreement between the UK and UAE not requiring animals to be quarantined suggests other countries have no such agreement. Priorities change when fleeing bombings.

[–] GooseGang@beehaw.org 1 points 22 hours ago

I was worried that might be the case.

[–] butwhyishischinabook@piefed.social 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Not to be too harsh, but if you want to be able to quickly flee sudden catastrophes then don't get a pet. If you're willing to abandon a pet to save yourself then you shouldn't own one. It's completely dependent on you and if you're not willing to put a dependent before yourself then you shouldn't have one. It may be a natural urge for you to abandon your dependents when your life literally depends on it, but giving in to that urge makes you a fundamentally bad person. 

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 1 points 19 hours ago

I have loved several pets over the course of my life. I had to rehome my last cat because I was moving into my van. But I had several weeks' notice and was able to do that in an orderly manner. "Quickly fleeing sudden catastrophes" is another beast entirely.

I'm guessing there's also been a run on crates for animals, so availability may be limited. And unless it's a service animal, you need one of those for a flight. I abhor the fact that pets are being abandoned, but ... consider the broader context. Assuming malice in the face of unexpected and sudden life changes shows, to me, the lack of empathy you're lamenting about those who had to abandon pets.

In the states, in peacetime, sure, this sounds horrific. But neither of those propositions is on the table. Kitties eating from automated dispensers in no way means their former owners aren't distraught about the decision.