this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
194 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

82460 readers
3224 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bonenode@piefed.social 23 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The nudge at Norway in the end is a bit strange. They oppose enshitification. Age checks could be part of that but I wouldn't say it is a given. I'd rather look at the Norwegian government's stance on privacy in the internet, not sure what it is.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

I hate the idea of age checks, but OS is the next best thing if they don't share the information beyond. In truth it is pointless other than tracking people.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 9 points 12 hours ago

The real answer is to swap it. Make websites have a tag for the type of content they contain. Browsers can then be configured to allow/disallow different types.

You get a way better version of the same claimed benefit of parental controls (that we know is a lie in the current version), and we aren't forcing our identification to be uploaded to major hacking target sites with questionable security

[–] ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world 28 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

"If"

They will. Once the age check at an OS level is implemented, the next level is to enforce that this check then use a verification service. And then to make this information available to sites upon access.

[–] LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip 21 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I 100% agree. Then there will be different (mandatory) verification services. Some will be paid, but the free ones (ran by Microslop and Google) that will sell all your personal data to their 500+ closest affiliates.

Ultimately, the end game will be certain websites (like your Bank) won't trust your identity because your using some FOSS verification service and as "they take security seriously" will require you to use MS or Google.

[–] Tim_Bisley@piefed.social 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Ultimately, the end game will be certain websites (like your Bank) won’t trust your identity because your using some FOSS verification service and as “they take security seriously” will require you to use MS or Google.

You can see parts of this already. When I'm browsing the web in Linux I get hot with way more captcha checks when accessing websites than when using Windows.

[–] astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz 2 points 11 hours ago

Even moreso with ad-blocker and PiHole. I swear that every corporate website has me do a captcha of some kind every time I click a link.

On that note, just denying trackers breaks SO many email links, and it feels like it gets worse and worse each year.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

How would you even implement it otherwise?

(Well actually, you as a parent would be an admin, and create appropriate accounts for your children, and any third party would trust that age number set on that user account, thus pushing the burden back on the parent to properly parent. But they won’t do that because this isn’t really the point here.)

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

Well the way I view it is it's all useless. If a 10 year old goes to buy a phone, they can't do so without getting money from an adult who therefore approved of it. If a 15 year old buys a cell phone they can't.... Because they need an adult to have a credit card/bank that allows monthly payments. Only offered to an adult. If you are a minor you can only get one with an adults co-sign. Thus the idea that a child has access to the Internet without an adults consent is just untrue 99.9 percent of the time. schools monitor the traffic . So every situation comes down to negligence on the parent. Who will sign their account in, or their credit card on the kids phone... bypassing all reason for the laws