this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
119 points (97.6% liked)

UK Politics

5390 readers
160 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/33694

Starmer attempts to make up with the warmongering US president as tens of thousands protest against the bombing of Iran over the weekend


From Morning Star via This RSS Feed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] oce@jlai.lu 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It's hard to understand why UK would follow again after the debacle in Irak. I guess it's some realpolitik bullshit? At least Spain learned its lesson. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/02/world/middleeast/spain-denies-us-air-base.html

[–] WalleyeWarrior@midwest.social 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Because the government believes in the war. That's why they have made any criticism of Israel illegal. Starmer is literally just a return to Blairism which is why Labour is so unpopular now.

[–] flabberjabber@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's not even Blairism friend. It's corporate light bullshit with a dash of authoritarianism thrown in. At least under Blair, services were well provided for. There was no NHS black-hole and social care wasn't at breaking point. There was no laying authoritarian ground work for a incoming fascist frog by abandoning any pretense of personal freedom.

Whilst Blair never really challenged the status quo in any meaningful way, be that reform of either house, evolution to PR or tackling the wealthy's grip on society, he didn't actively seek to worsen it either. For many, his government levelled the playing field economically; and his funding of services benefitted generations of Britons.

Starmer's government is a thinly veiled imitation. One that wraps quasi-austerity in a spending bow whilst making one authoritarian move after another. Lurching from age verification to increased powers to stop legitimate protest.

They are not the same. We'd be better off with a lettuce. But will probably end up with a fascist frog thanks to him betraying his mandate.

[–] 20dogs@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

One of the most economically interventionist governments in decades. Hardly Blairism.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 6 points 1 day ago

Because Ghislaine Maxwell and Epstein operated in the UK extensively and Andrew was just the tip of the iceberg. Israel probably has blackmail on Starmer and much of parliament.