this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2026
69 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

9089 readers
127 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 33 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Have we finally stopped pretending the layoffs are being caused by AI replacing workers?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If you had a customer service phone center job that was replaced with an AI chatbot, you certainly did lose your job to AI.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Not exactly. I'm sure there are specific cases where someone lost their job because AI does it better, but in most cases they lost their job because we're in a recession and the company needed to use chatbots to cut costs.

[–] III@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

...decided to use chatbots to cut costs. Also, AI doesn't do it better.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Well, it cuts costs in the short run. In the long run it's more expensive because (for most jobs) it does a worse job and requires human intervention to fix the problems it creates, but that's next fiscal quarter's problem.

[–] idriss@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I interacted once with a person fired from a QA position from Amazon (US) and she insisted that it was because of AI 100% so that kinda messed up my strong opinions tbh, maybe some are actually being fired because of it?

[–] fox@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago

LLMs are fundamentally incapable of replacing jobs that do anything useful, but one of the main uses of an LLM is for an executive to posture that it will replace your job. And a lot of executives are fucking morons that genuinely believe LLMs can replace your job.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

Well, I believe they told her that.