this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2026
200 points (99.5% liked)
Geopolitics
518 readers
179 users here now
Welcome
Visit us on Matrix at #geopol:matrix.org
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I tend to trust the IAEA, not the Iranian government, how about you?
Ok, trust them then fool
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20260304-iaea-says-no-evidence-iran-is-building-a-nuclear-bomb/
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/04/us-israel-strikes-iran-nuclear-program-could-backfire
Thanks for proving my point. From the article you linked:
You don't need HEU for civilian nuclear power operations.
You ignored the main part though
You don't need "a structured programme to manufacture nuclear weapons" for it to be clear that's what the intention is. At that point it's already too late.
Again: You don’t need highly enriched uranium (HEU) for civilian nuclear power operations.
Did you ignore the part of there being no evidence Iran was developing a nuclear bomb?
Here let me make it a bit easier to read:
a stockpile of just over 440kg of highly enriched uranium (HEU), of 60% purity
a stockpile of just over 440kg of highly enriched uranium (HEU), of 60% purity
Since it is so easy why didn't they do it?
Because they got bombed?
They was at 60% for 4 years
did…did you read it though?