120
NVIDIA could enter the desktop CPU market with performance equal to AMD and Intel
(www.tweaktown.com)
this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
120 points (91.7% liked)
Technology
82329 readers
3800 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
phrasing is odd. 25% lower clock speed isnt “far below”
but also fuck nvidia
I don't think it should even be comparable between totally different architectures.
Yeah, we've been through this exact same game with multiple iterations of Intel and AMD chips. When AMD first started doing consumer CPUs they badged them according to their equivalent Intel clock speed because one to one comparisons were misleading.
What's the L1 and L2 cache? What are the bus speeds? How many cores and how are they architectured? Multi-threading? How many steps is the instruction cycle? There are so many factors beyond just clock speed that play into real world performance.
I can't believe people still look at Hz and think it's a sole metric that can be used for performance.
Do you think they look at the 2005 Pentium 4's 3.8GHz and assume it's only slightly worse than what Nvidia will put on the market?
I'd take one of those. My P4 is only 3.0 GHz.
I'm hopeful ARM will follow more the licensing path than the going full Android path. I think stronger ARM computers, built at the ISA level by any company are also stronger RISCV computers. Builders like Rockchip (China) show that ARM and RISCV computers will bring alternatives to people, possibly with smaller fabs or on demand.
Truly open/libre systems will have to be RISCV. They don't have to be the fastest.
AHEM! AKTCHEWALEE..... it's 20% which is even less qualified to be "far below" the other two.
Thanks! Thats more accurate
No worries bud! The wording is still ridiculous...and also fuck Nvidia 😒🖕
You willing to take a 25% pay cut? Yeah that’s hella far. Especially when you’re up in the GHz range.