this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
75 points (97.5% liked)
Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related
4264 readers
109 users here now
Health: physical and mental, individual and public.
Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.
See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.
Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.
Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.
Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.
Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I won’t argue against reputable peer reviewed data. It’s deeply unsatisfying to learn that there have been no strides made to increase options for pregnant people.
Unpaywalled for you
https://www.acog.org/news/news-releases/2025/09/acog-affirms-safety-benefits-acetaminophen-pregnancy
As with all medical research up to now unfortunately, anyone who isn't a white cis male is treated as a second class citizen - especially in the areas of pain relief. Couple that with the desire to maximize profits, and the drug companies don't bother looking to make real improvements.
How would you propose finding more drugs for pregnant women? Because generally double blind clinical trials is the best way. Experimenting on pregnant women is considered unethical, which is part of the problem.
Yes, it would be great if we knew more but the fact of the matter is that there is neither the commercial impetus to study more, more the ethical ease of consent from a foetus.
Most data on safety comes from drugs already in use and 'presumed' safe due to their long standing use. Newer drugs are avoided but when taken without realizing they are pregnant or if there is no later active and studying the outcome is the only available options. That doesn't give much data.
I understand what you’re putting down, but it is still the same disappointing conclusion. The mechanical realities of the situation are irrelevant to someone already sighing and accepting, albeit overly verbosely, what they’ve learned.
No, you’re spouting misinformation, without understanding the damage that can cause, nor the realities of why there is less data.