this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
23 points (96.0% liked)

Politics

11412 readers
161 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem had her ass handed to her during a congressional hearing on Tuesday — and not just by Democrats. In a shift from their usual coddling of President Donald Trump’s Cabinet members, some Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee laid into Noem, grilling her on her leadership at the agency amid growing public disapproval of the administration’s increasingly violent anti-immigration crackdown.

Noem still got plenty of softballs from Republican lawmakers, but the pressure from other members of the GOP was notable given the degree to which Trump’s immigration policies could shape the midterm elections.

Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), who is not running for reelection this year, berated Noem as the arbiter of a “disaster” for the federal government, taking her to task for everything from her handling of investigations into ICE misconduct, to shooting her dog. “I’m giving you a performance evaluation here — I’m not looking for a response,” he said.

“Quality matters, not quantity,” Tillis said of the administration’s demand that DHS meet certain deportation quotas. “What we have seen is a disaster under your leadership Mrs. Noem, a disaster. What we’ve seen are innocent people getting detained that turn out are American citizens. … Time after time after time, I have been disappointed.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I’m pretty sure this is in response to this particular article spinning the narrative as if some Republicans are actually concerned about what Noem has been up to.

The citation is this article you posted.

Not sure I agree with them though; the article is doing a pretty good job at reporting what actually happened instead of trying to editorialize it for us.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, Tillis has nothing to gain from grandstanding; he's not running for reelection. The coverage here seems up to snuff.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 3 points 20 hours ago

I'd argue that Tillis retiring is exactly why he's saying this stuff - it's his way of playing both sides of the fence He's getting out while he can still (partially) claim deniability, putting on this show with Noem, and at the same time voting to let Trump continue to bomb Iran unchecked. By participating in this farce now, he limits the amount of flack he'll get for it from the True Believers, yet he's also providing cover for Republicans who think ICE has gone too far. And in the end, absolutely nothing significant will change.