this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
62 points (84.4% liked)

Technology

82188 readers
6151 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
62
Apple Accidentally Leaks 'MacBook Neo' (www.macrumors.com)
submitted 1 day ago by mudkip to c/technology@lemmy.world
122 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Apple appears to have prematurely revealed the name of its rumored lower-cost MacBook model, which is expected to be announced this Wednesday. A regulatory document for a "MacBook Neo" (Model A3404) has appeared on Apple's website. Unfortunately, there are no further details or images available yet. While the PDF file does not contain the "MacBook Neo" name, it briefly appeared in a link on Apple's regulatory website for EU compliance purposes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] artyom@piefed.social -1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

So we're back to "everyone is stupid except for me".

No we're not. I've already addressed this, please scroll up.

Customers want thin, light, and good water resistance.

  1. We already had several models with all of those things
  2. Even the iPhone Air is thick enough to fit a headphone jack.
  3. For the third time, none of this is about what consumers want.

So we're back to "everyone is stupid except for me".

If your strategy is to repeat the same nonsense over and over without addressing my rebuttal then you can go ahead and stop replying to me.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

No we're not. I've already addressed this, please scroll up.

Yes, we are. If you believe people have to be tricked or manipulated into valuing different features than you do, you're just using a lot of extra words to say "everyone is stupid except for me".

[–] artyom@piefed.social -1 points 3 hours ago

It's not what I believe and it's not what I've said. I was very clear about what my position and you're just intentionally misrepresenting it. You're being blocked now, goodbye.