this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
531 points (100.0% liked)

History Memes

2099 readers
1828 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism (including tankies/red fash), atrocity denial or apologia, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Piefed.social rules.

  5. History referenced must be 20+ years old.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 2 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I mean to say that a heat pipe not only contains less water per unit area for the phase changing cycle, since its under vacuum, but also the cycle only works at a particular heat per unit volume and temperature range. If you go past the temp range you get runaway.

Water in an active cycle has an almost unlimited ability to relocate heat. You still need to give that heat to something else, but you can pass a kilo of water thru a tiny labyrinth of fins at the heat source and a large surface area radiator with fan on the heat sink side. Vs a few ounces of water trapped inside a pipe running as a heat engine basically. Active pumping is brute force. At some point you won't be able to contain the water pressure if your source is too hot, but there are many different working fluids.

Its irritating when we try designing a new cooling system at work and some guy will always want a heat pipe when clearly there is only a narrow band where those things are effective. Specially annoying if you don't have control over the heat source. If you did have control over the source, then maybe you can tune it for a heat pipe. Car engines don't have heat pipes. Solar collectors don't use heat pipes either for the most part. Heat pipes need a constant source of heat that always stays below their max bandwidth.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I feel the need to point out that water cooling has an upper limit as well. If you get things hot enough, the water is going to flash into steam, at which point it’s going to decimate whatever system it’s in.

You can add additives to prevent that, but at some point it’s no longer “water”.

Reading this back, I suppose this is pedantism. But still.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, you control the flashpoint via pressure. the higher the pressure, the higher the temperature. However at some point it makes more sense to use a molten salt, an oil or a liquid metal to transport heat away.

If the temperature is near 20C to 100C there's nothing like flowing water.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 3 points 15 hours ago

It doesn't work for a lot of things, but your PC is basically a couple of flat panels where a lot of heat produced is localized to the GPU and CPU and it is potentially very easy to maintain a directed airflow close to them. A heatsink is basically good enough for that, and almost every GPU incorporates one, even the 5090's, even though the airflow design usually sucks for all of them because of how generic it is. Speaking of car engines, you can go a step better and precisely control the airflow to get great cooling results just with air cooling: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cehXZftIYok

I see your point, but if it works nearly as well, why go for a costlier solution that requires more maintenance and lasts less when it doesn't require it?