this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
351 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

82250 readers
3950 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The point both of you deliberately overlook is that China is not participating in a free market anyway. They never played by those rules so there‘s no point in treating them the same way as anyone who does. There is a lot of hypocrisy to be found in politics and economics around the world and China itself is a prime example of that. But a measure to defend yourself from an obvious case of economic warfare is the most understandable thing in history. Your criticism is misplaced and irrational. I mean do you seriously think a monopoly is desirable?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I don’t think anyone is denying Chinese aggressive intent here, just our response. Give us a response where we can get onboard, a response that is more legitimate than their approach, and wecan all be mad at China.

Or think of it this way. We all agree on all the ways China are the bad guys, but our behavior is making them look like the good guys. wtf are we doing?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

When has the US ever participated in a free market?

Man..interweb really drinks that anti-China koolaid.

[–] monkeyjoe@lemmy.world -1 points 15 hours ago

Decades of propaganda works. Centuries of racism helps as well.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We've had of ecocomic warfare already. It was just fine for US companies to hollow out domestic manufacturing so China could build the manufacturing infrastructure that could have been built in the US.

But now that a Chinese company is building things that undercut a US company, you want protections for US billionaires that weren't afforded to US workers.

American companies only make up a small portion of the US auto industry.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Are you ignoring the whole subsidies thing on purpose? This is not BYD attacking Tesla. This is the Chinese government attacking western industries.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

USA subsidized Detroit $80B since 2008, and that's ignoring state graft for building assembly plants. What the fuck did they do with that money, attack Eastern industries?

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, it was $79.7B to be exact. And what the US government did with that was not cut checks, but rather, purchased stock in the companies.

When it sold the stock it bought from manufacturers, it sold for around $70B. When they sold the approximately $2.4B invested into Ally (an auto financing firm), it sold for $17.2B.

So the money spent in 2008 actually made a profit. It was not distributed to the manufacturers or finance companies at all. Just used to shore up their value to prevent them from going out of business – and more importantly, probably, make sure investors didn't lose money, or at least not too much.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

When you take into account inflation and the overall market gains over that time, they absolutely did not make their money back.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world -1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

When you take into account that the original assertion was tht eighty billion was given to the auto manufacturers, I don't think my comment deserves the reaction it got, not a reply like yours.

Would you rather they ended up with zero dollars?

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Would you rather they ended up with zero dollars?

Yes.

The only terms under which I could potential accept tax money being used to save a company from a collapse leading to massive layoffs, is if the resulting company is also made entirely employee owned.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Well, that's not how it would happen and you know it.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 22 hours ago

Well, it was $79.7B to be exact.

oh, touche! but that was only after 2008, and not including previous bailouts to Ford. Then, every state, everywhere is paying to either get or keep assembly plants but that does not factor into your selective math.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is BYD selling cars for less than the billionaires you care about want to.

Nothing more.

If an American company badge engineered these cars and sold them in the US at US prices, you would be fine with it just like you're fine with the economic warfare against the poor that US manufacturers and China have been allies in for decades.

[–] BoJackHorseman@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If the Chinese government is losing money on each car they export, soon China will be bankrupt. It only makes sense to buy more China cars at cheap rates and bankrupt their country.

Also, there is no proof of subsidy, it's just made up Western cope.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

The US government has been propping up Detroit for over 20 years with over $100B in subsidies and tax relief, plus every state government grafts to get a new assembly plant.

BMW is not in South Carolina for the quality of workers.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There no such thing as a free market. It's a constant pull between monopolistic forces and government restriction.

[–] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 hours ago

And there never will be. Not so long as it is possible to hide information from the consumer, and any sort of barrier to entry exists for market competition to spring up.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Ideally, although the US is trying our best for monopolies…

[–] Damage@feddit.it 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

China defends its interests and follows what rules it deems advantageous. Just like everyone else does. It may upset you but they're just better at playing this game than most countries nowadays.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Because they don't have a class of politicians and billionaires stuffing their pockets.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 0 points 20 hours ago

Nobody's immune to that