this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
197 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

82188 readers
3853 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

Yeah, a couple problems with that:

  1. You're going to have a tire pressure light on forever.
  2. There's a reason these are mandated. They're critical safety (and efficiency) systems.

As always, these are systems of convenience, and the alternative is to check your tire pressures every day before leaving home.

Older cars use a wheel speed sensor-based TPMS. It's not as effective or reliable but it also doesn't emit any signals that can be read by other devices.

[–] ragepaw@lemmy.ca 20 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I managed to drive cars for 30 years without a TPMS sensor and the only time I ever had a to check the pressure on a tire, was when I knew i had a leak and didn't have time to fix it. I can also tell by the way my car drives if a tire is soft. I also had an air pump in my car powered by a cigarette lighter adapter that I could fill my tires.

My current car, from 2019 doesn't have one. I've managed to own it 7 years (this week) without needing to check the pressure 2500 times.

The assertion you need to check your pressure everyday without a TPMS system is ridiculous.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 2 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

If you didn't check your tire pressure in the last 20 minutes how do you know you didn't just drive over a nail and get a slow leak? TPMS checks every few seconds so you know when there is a small problem. Anyone will notice a fully flat tire, but a lot of people used to drive on low tire pressure for months without knowing. Once someone knew their tire had a problem they would check daily (until they got it fixed), but many people never knew in the first place, and even though who did know often took a week before they found out - they of course have no way to know since nobody checked their tire pressure daily much less every 20 minutes.

[–] hobovision@mander.xyz 3 points 17 hours ago

Low tire pressure is not a safety issue, more of a efficiency issue, until it is so low that you'd need to be paying ZERO attention to the car's handling to not notice. Lower pressure actually increases performance (to a point, and depending on the tire) because it can allow more rubber to contact the road. It is pretty typical to air down to around 20 psi for performance driving even if it's closer to 35 for daily driving.

It's very easy to notice if one tire loses pressure because you'll have a very strong pull to one side, almost like a bad alignment. I got my tires rotated at a shop and they deflated the tires for some reason and forgot to refill one of them. On my way home I was freaking out that they fucked my alignment because it was handling so weird on the suburban roads home (not even twisty performance driving). My TPMS didn't even go off until I was basically home already. When I checked the tire it was maybe 15 or 20. Certainly not dangerous but also certainly noticeable.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I've been driving for 30 years. Do you want to guess how many times that's happened to me?

Meanwhile, I've apparently been living in a totalitarian surveillance state for at least a few years now, and you know how many times that's happened to me? I'll give you a hint, it's more than the number of times I've run over a nail causing me to drive around on low tire pressure without knowing it.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

What matters is the whole community. Statistically it happens to someone in your community. Society wasted a lot of fuel (read global warming) just on low tire pressure.

Surveillance is a problem. So is global warming.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 1 points 19 hours ago

That may have been the intention but I doubt it ever worked as effectively as they claimed it would. Besides, it will probably cost at least 1 AI data-center of carbon emissions to continuously surveil all these people with TPMS sensors, so the argument could be made that you're actually reducing carbon pollution at this point by removing yours.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Have you met people? Do you think that battered old Chevy is driven by someone who cares about the TPMS light? They can ignore it as effectively as the check engine light.

[–] hector@lemmy.today -1 points 20 hours ago

I am suspicious of that being the motivation behind this.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -4 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

The fact that you've gotten away with it is not proof that it's unnecessary. The fact that it was legally mandated is good evidence that it is. These systems save lives, no question about it.

[–] ragepaw@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

What a shockingly wrong take. TPMS is a convenience, not a safety measure, have properly inflated tires is. And, anyone who properly maintains their car, doesn't need it

And, it's not legally mandated everywhere, even if it is for you.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

What an incredibly bad take. Indeed, having properly inflated tires is a safety issue. How do you know if they're properly inflated? Are you checking them every 3 minutes while driving? Because TPMS is...

[–] ragepaw@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Because I was bored

GIDAS data

https://www.ircobi.org/wordpress/downloads/irc0111/2009/Session2/2_3.pdf

It concludes that even if you increased grip, which includes tire pressure variance, by 15%, it would only represent a reduction of 2% of road related fatalities, which is actually within the margin of error.

While 2% sounds like a lot, GIDAS also shows that tire failures account for less than 1% of road accidents causing death.

So you're spending $300 to $500 on a new car for a TPMS which reduces the probability of accidental death by 0.02%.

And fun fact, most tire related accidents are actually from tread depth, not low pressure, and TPMS will do fuck all to tell you your tread depth is low.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 6 hours ago

It concludes that even if you increased grip

It's nothing to do with grip. In fact, a lower tire pressure will actually increase grip.

tire failures account for less than 1% of road accidents causing death.

Oh well if no one died it must not be a safety issue?

So you're spending $300 to $500 on a new car for a TPMS

Uhhh nope, it comes with the car...

And fun fact, most tire related accidents are actually from tread depth, not low pressure

So we're just going to ignore it as a safety issue because it's not a main cause of collisions?

[–] ragepaw@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Because I am not a complete fucking idiot.

If you truly believe that nonsense you are spewing, your probably shouldn't be driving. You are unaware of the operational aspects of your vehicle and are a danger to the people around you.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 6 hours ago

Because I am not a complete fucking idiot.

Mmmmmm

You are unaware of the operational aspects of your vehicle and are a danger to the people around you.

WTF is a "operational aspect"?

[–] Delilah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Legal != effective or ethical, that is an unbelievably stupid argument for TPMS.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

LOL who said anything about ethics? This is an unbelievably stupid strawman.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

indeed, you said this:

The fact that it was legally mandated is good evidence that it is.

but their point was laws are not always made with good intentions and safety in mind. that's not to say TPMS is required for secret surveillance, but that there being a law for it does not immediately mean there's good purpose for that law.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

indeed, you said this

Indeed, that had nothing to do with ethics.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago

yes it has, when a law not only just does not have good purpose, but even malicious, but even when the added safety is not outweighed by the bad things it does

[–] __hetz@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Do you believe law and ethics are separable? Does your "these systems save lives" not speak to the very reasoning employed to codify an ethical position into the law of the land?

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 9 hours ago

Why are we still talking about ethics? I'm not going to entertain this strawman any further.

[–] greyscale@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 21 hours ago

lots of things are legally mandated without any good evidence.

Lots of things legally mandated in the past are now unconscionable or illegal now.

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I live in Canada and my snow tires haven't had functioning TPMS in years. I do have a tire pressure light on forever, and they're not mandated.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Cool. Did you come here just to tell us that you're proud to drive unsafely or what?

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Do you drive without a LIDAR? Why, do you like to live dangerously?

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 14 hours ago

If my car had LIDAR I would certainly take reasonable measures to ensure it continued working, yes.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

1.) Lol, no I won't. That light can be removed. Or if it's a Ford, you can access the vehicle with Forscan and turn off that functionality.

2.) How did we ever survive before 2008? Were there disabled cars with shredded tires every 20 feet? Was it an apocalypse of failed tires? People who don't bother to check tire pressure won't bother for yet another warning light on their dash.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That light can be removed

LOL often times it cannot, because it's not a "light" at all on modern vehicles.

How did we ever survive before 2008?

A lot of people didn't. That's why it was mandated.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Maybe YOU can't remove the light.