this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
153 points (99.4% liked)

DeclineIntoCensorship

1131 readers
497 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Feyd@programming.dev 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The content is said to "normalise the sexualisation of children, promote the idea that children consent, and fuel demand for real child abuse material"

So academia supports this? Oh we're just curtailing freedom on vibes again?

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 9 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah I worry they are putting the cart out before the horse. Imho "barely legal" (porn featuring people who look or are portrayed as barely of the legal age of consent) porn being as widespread and popular as it is, isn't the cause of sexual violence against children and adolescents, but rather a culture of adults that sexualise minors and would perpetrate that violence anyway are the reason the content is as popular as it is.

Ofc I have even less data to go off of than the authors of this bill but this has vibes of "video games cause violence" all over again

[–] Noja@sopuli.xyz 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Most teenagers watch porn, and "barely legal" porn is made mostly for them and their fantasies.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 1 points 16 hours ago

I don't think that's the whole story, but without hard data there's not much point diving further

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 18 hours ago

You can say this about nearly any porn