this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
131 points (100.0% liked)

news

24772 readers
590 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A reminder that as the US continues to threaten countries around the world, fedposting is to be very much avoided (even with qualifiers like "in Minecraft") and comments containing it will be removed.

Image is of the Minab Girls' School in Iran, which was attacked by Western forces who killed (as of the time of writing this) nearly 200 people, including many schoolgirls.


I have a longer statement below in spoiler tags, but for those who just want to get into the megathread itself, the very short version of my take is: things are going about as well as they realistically could go for Iran as of me writing this on March 2nd; the US and Zionists have clearly misplayed their hand; there's so much propaganda it's hard to get a good perspective of the overall conflict; I think if Iran is still fighting on at approximately the same pace as the end of this week then things are looking VERY bad for the West; I am unsure what the ultimate result of this conflict will be now that the new crop of Iranian leadership are in charge after Khamenei's assassination but am hopeful that anti-American sentiment has been yet further cemented and those in Iran who seek repproachment with the West will be further discredited in favor of those who wish to look East.

My Idle RamblingsAs we are now past the initial 48 hours of the war, what can be said with confidence is that the Iran of today is in a considerably more organized position than they were during the Twelve Days War, as the initial delay on meaningfully responding to enemy attacks was brought from something like 10 hours to about 1 hour. Unfortunately, given the not-insignificant number of Iranian top figures killed, Iran still has considerable opsec problems; whatever the hell Sinwar was doing to stay alive for over a year in the most bombed territory on the planet obviously hasn't reached Iran yet. However, to Iran's credit, the recovery was fast and effective, Khamenei had already drawn up detailed plans for the succession chain in the event of his death, and the new figures were clearly in position to take control of the situation within the hour. The name of the game appears to be greater decentralization of the military, making Zionist narratives about "decapitation" essentially meaningless - the hydra has a thousand heads.

This time around, there are fewer direct critiques to level at Russia and China. In an abstract sense, they could certainly "do more" (Xi, donate one million Chinese drones and let Iran and Yemen blot out the sun!), but to be geopolitically serious, it appears that the Twelve Days War delivered a swift kick up the ass of both Iran and China to start working more closely together, and so Iran now has access to Chinese intelligence and satellite tools, has been receiving certain military equipment like much better radars, and, one hopes, will provide greater economic assistance during and after this war's conclusion.

The overall impacts of the US's and Zionists' strikes on Iran, and vice versa, have been very hard to assess due to the customary tsunami of misinformation and comical exaggerations. Clearly, the most sensational claims - that Western aircraft feel safe enough to fly directly over Iranian territory (let alone that they have air superiority, let alone that they have air supremacy); that Iran's leadership have been killed in meaningful numbers; that Iran is on the verge of collapse or giving in; that Western losses are insignificant; that things are going well or better than expected; etc, are obviously for the general population and peanut gallery, and the situation looks very different from within the halls of power. Nonetheless, stitching every individual missile/drone strike together from both sides into a cohesive picture from which we can draw conclusions has always been a major challenge of present-day warfare, and is certainly challenging here. What can be generally gathered is that Iran does not seem to fear striking Occupied Palestine or American bases directly and with pretty significant firepower, but either is deliberately not focussing on the fleet or does not have the capability to focus on it, leaving American warships intact. And from the highest perspective, it's unclear whether Iran is only beginning a long term war of attrition, or whether they hope to not overly anger the US and Zionists so that an offramp later is possible, or indeed, that the West is succeeding in attriting Iran's offensive capabilities faster than Iran can attrit the West's (or a mixture of all three).

The assassination of Khamenei and other figures is a symbolic victory for the West, as he was one of the last remaining pre-October 7th Resistance leaders alive or in power. Reports are that he stayed at his compound despite being advised in the days before the attack that he should leave, knowing that he would likely very soon die, as he did not want to flee to Russia or hide in bunkers. It's currently unclear to me how impactful his death will be in the end. On the one hand, it is obvious to every serious analyst that his death will not negatively impact Iran's military operations, nor will it lead to regime change in the short or medium term - Iran's government is not a strongman regime (few governments truly are), and the current government is both very durable and has very widespread legitimacy. His replacements and subordinates are already in charge, and from what I can tell, effectively were in charge long before his death.

On the other hand, succession is a bit of a risky process for nations today, in the short and long term. If whoever is left as his replacement at the end of this war - I cannot safely assume it will be Khamenei's immediate replacement in the current environment of Western strikes - ultimately leans even a little more reformist and towards reproachment with the West than Khamenei did, then this whole war may be worth it to the West regardless of the materiel losses. Alternatively, if this war causes a permanent shift away from repproachment and genuine, sustained, and hard-to-repair damage to America's foothold in the Middle East as well as the attrition of most of the US's interceptor missiles, we may indeed be looking at a region soon to be free of Zionist designs. It is much too early for me to distinguish which path we are on.


Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

The Zionist Entity's Genocide of Palestine

If you have evidence of Zionist crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against the temporary Zionist entity. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on the Zionists' destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

Mirrors of Telegram channels that have been erased by Zionist censorship.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tervell@hexbear.net 40 points 2 months ago (3 children)

https://archive.ph/X9iN5

What is the U.S. military's capacity to carry out extended strikes in Iran?

Seth Jones of the center for Strategic and International Studies talks about the U.S military's capacity to carry out extended strikes in Iran, and Iran's ability to retaliate.

more

EMILY KWONG, HOST: Practically speaking, how long can the U.S. continue to trade strikes with Iran? According to one estimate, about a week. A 2023 report from the Center for Strategic and International Studies warned a war with a major power could deplete some U.S. munitions stockpiles. Now, with the possibility of U.S. strikes extending for more than a few days, we've called Seth Jones. He's the author of that report and the president of the Defense and Security Department at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Welcome to ALL THINGS CONSIDERED.

SETH JONES: Thanks, Emily, for having me.

KWONG: You wrote this report a few years ago. Is your assessment still the same, thinking about what's happening right now?

JONES: Well, the report focused on the challenges that the U.S. industrial base faces. The particular focus on a week was some of the key munitions the U.S. needs for a war in Taiwan straits, like long-range, anti-ship missiles, for example, or JASSMs, extended-range ones. In the war we're seeing in Iran, it's a little bit different. The U.S. is not using some of those long-range, anti-ship missiles. But on some areas like air defense systems - THAADs, Patriots...

KWONG: OK.

JONES: ...The U.S. almost certainly will start to feel some pain on munition stockpiles sooner rather than later. Just one data point on this - in 2025, the U.S. military fired a quarter of all of its THAAD missiles in a few days of operations against Iran. So we already went through a chunk of those last year.

KWONG: This is something not every American person knows. So question, also, does Israel's involvement in these strikes alter your assessment in any way of what the U.S. could do here?

JONES: Well, Iran - sorry - Israel does have a range of its own stockpiles of weapons - both offensive missiles, drones, as well as air defense systems. But I think the reality is neither Israel nor the United States have sufficient munitions, either offensive or defensive, for a war that really lasts weeks into months. It will...

KWONG: How long could it last based on...

JONES: It would depend...

KWONG: ...Ammunition availability?

JONES: Yeah. It would depend on the type of missiles. The - one good example, the U.S. has used, for example, GBU-31s. These are smart bombs. There's a pretty large stockpile of those. But it's the big ones, like the GBU-52 - these are the massive ordinance penetrators, the bunker busters. The stockpile of those is much lower, and they come from B-2 stealth bombers. So U.S. is going to have to pick and choose which types of munitions it can use in that case.

KWONG: So the U.S. defense budget in FY '25 was $2 trillion. That's a lot of money. How can the U.S. spend so much on defense and still face the possibility of depleting munition stockpiles?

JONES: Well, the reality is if you look at the comparison on the procurement budget, which is what it spends on weapons right now - now versus, say, the Reagan administration - it spends a significant amount less on that. And what the U.S. spends a lot of its defense budget is on the Tricare, the welfare system for servicemen and women. So that defense budget goes into a lot of different costs overall.

KWONG: Right. The military is more than weapons. It's all the people in service.

JONES: Exactly.

JONES: Yeah. What do you know of Iran's capacity to continue to hit U.S. targets? Do you know anything of that?

JONES: Yeah. So by mid-2025, there are a range of estimates that Iran had about 3,000 ballistic missiles, about 400 missile launchers, and then a fair number of drones, including Shaheds. These are one-way attack drones. Actually, the Russians have used them in Ukraine. I think the challenge in assessing right now is that that has been a major focus of U.S. and Israeli strikes right now. So the big question, or one big question, is how much damage have they actually caused right now to Iran's missile stockpiles. I know going into the planning of this...

KWONG: Yeah.

JONES: ...U.S. and Israeli planners were going to use that as a major element of targeting for the first part of the campaign, which is what they've done. And again, the question is, how much...

KWONG: Yeah.

JONES: ...Damage did they do to those missiles?

KWONG: Iran has so far responded by attacking U.S. and Israeli military targets throughout the Middle East, as you've mentioned, but can Iran reach the continental U.S.?

? JONES: The only way Iran, at this point, could reach the continental U.S. is if it was able to pull off a - some kind of a terrorist attack by the Islamic Revolutionary Guards' Quds Force, its global paramilitary arm of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard, or one of Iran's proxy forces like Hezbollah. That's probably, at this point, the only way Iran could really pull off an attack inside of the U.S. And we have seen that before. I mean, there were - there was a big plot in Washington, D.C. a little over a decade ago at one of the big D.C. restaurants. So there have been some threats. There was a threat against President Trump during the election campaign. So that's really the big consideration inside the U.S. homeland.

KWONG: Are you worried about it?

JONES: I mean, I think the Iranian regime is - has been targeted. Its leader has been killed. I think at this point, the Iranians are going to do whatever they can to fire back, whether it's missiles or these kinds of asymmetric attacks. So I think at...

KWONG: Yeah.

JONES: ...This point, frankly, anything is possible.

KWONG: There are, of course, allies who rely on America for defense. I'm thinking about Ukraine. I'm thinking about Taiwan. Does a depleted U.S. stockpile put those allies at risk?

JONES: That is a very interesting question. The U.S. has war plans for North Korea, for Russia and for China. And the more it uses in this Iran war - Tomahawks, for example, or some of these big bunker busters, these MOABs - the less it's going to have for deterrence, and if deterrence fails, any kind of activity in Ukraine to support Taiwan or elsewhere.

KWONG: That is Seth Jones. He's the president of the Defense and Security Department at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Thank you for speaking with us.

JONES: Thank you.

[–] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 24 points 2 months ago

US military budget is all being spent on woke public healthcare

[–] Dr_Gabriel_Aby@hexbear.net 22 points 2 months ago

A lot of the budget is spent on the fact that military factories and facilities are spread out into every single voting district, so every representative is at risk of losing votes or bad press for voting against these companies getting money. They are weakening their own military interests, in order to keep the representative system captured by the MIC.

[–] NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago

Not even mentioning that procurement is all through private contracts with MIC companies that gouge the prices to hell, and that the pentagon can’t pass an audit, when discussing the US military budget is wild.