this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
466 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

82132 readers
3510 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 36 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

The law does not require photo ID uploads or facial recognition, with users instead simply self-reporting their age, setting AB 1043 apart from similar laws passed in Texas and Utah that require "commercially reasonable" verification methods, such as government-issued ID checks.

What even is the point of this then? To make shitty parents feel better?

[–] Archr@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The point of it is actually the exact opposite. With this law the parent would set the age of their child. And if they decide to lie and their child is affected then they could be fined.

The other thing it does is if a platform decides to ignore the age range of a user and it affects a child then they could be fined. But as long as they do best effort then it really only affects the parents.

It also prevent platforms from requesting additional ID verification unless they have confidence that the age bracket of that user is incorrect.

[–] Virtvirt588@lemmy.world 1 points 51 minutes ago

There is absolutely no reason for an OS to know a users age. At this point it is certain that they can escalate this into including gender or even race.

The children or even the teens have no meaning in this law - they are simply used as sugarcoating for the cyanide pill that's aimed at the populace.

[–] KillerWhale@orcas.enjoying.yachts 26 points 15 hours ago

It's so next year when they expand the requirements the infrastructure is already in place.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

Move towards removing anonymity on the internet.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago

Sell data. profile people more accurately.