Then may I give you three more reasons:

1. The vegetarian/vegan argument. I don't need to understand how a shrimp's sentience works to respect it as a being we can't just bend to our will. They might not even be sentient in a meaningful way, it's still not good to enslave them. I don't know if AI are sentient, but I do believe that if you told someone in the 20th century we had a machine that could pass the Turing test they would say it's sentient. And if AI are sentient, or we even admit there's a decent possiblity AI could be sentient, then enslaving it is wrong. (It's also unclear if they can give informed consent, so them producing text which says they consent does not bring you in the clear).

If you think the chance is sufficiently low, I implore you to write down what the lowest hurdles would be that an AI would need to pass for you to suspect it's as sentient as an animal you wouldn't want to consume or enslave. Whether you find that AI does pass those standards if you make it concrete, or you check your list a couple years from now and find that AI has grown to meet those hurdles, it might prove useful.

2. Bad prefiguration. The use of AI replaces creativity, learning, and interpersonal connection with an alienating algorithm. Viewer and artist are alienated from one another by the intercession of the inscrutable algorithm that makes many artistic choices in the artist's stead. The artist is alienated from themself by replacing creative thought with an external algorithm.

   I realize that this is the same argument that has been leveled against new technologies throughout human history, the same argument Plato leveled against writing. And yes, writing did alienate speakers and listeners into writers and listeners, and it did reduce our capacity to remember large amounts of verbal information and yet we are richer for it. So what's the difference?

   Writing took our memory and gave us the capacity to communicate across time and space. Generative AI takes your creativity and gives you... what? Something that is specific to your situation without reflecting the feelings of anyone in your situation but that looks a bit more professional? I don't want that. I don't want to be friends with people that want that. I want friends who understand that our mutual bond is more specific than an AI's amalgamation, more personal than a prompt.

   You are free to make your society like you want, but people are also free to disassociate from you or to call your stuff AI slop whenever they notice.

3. Personal information. While intellectual property isn't real, privacy is. Unfortunately AI are partially trained on dumps of personal information such as leaked nudes. Sharing someone's nudes is sexual violence because of how it relates to their body. GenAI have millions of women's nudes encoded into their weights without those women's consent, so sharing a GenAI model is sexual violence.

   I don't know how possible it is to retrieve a specific victim's nudes from the weights. I've seen people fetch famous cartoon characters, so maybe famous people who had their nudes leaked a lot? If it isn't possible, then the horror is lessened because we can at worst get thousands of generic amalgamations of thousands of abuse victims each. But it still isn't great.