effort

7591 readers

1 users here now

Welcome to c/effort, the home of effort posts! This is a space where you can write on an topic, as long as it reflects real time and effort to put together.

Rules

Posts are text-only. No images or videos.

2.While the topic can be on anything, posts still require “effort”. While there isn’t a minimum word limit or anything, generally this means it’s longer than most other posts and there’s also that the expectation that your posts required real effort to write up.

“Master” posts that have a lot of links are welcomed.

No copypastas

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

SapGreen@hexbear.net

"p*do class" and why I dislike the implication of that (hexbear.net)

submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by Arahnya@hexbear.net to c/effort@hexbear.net

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cw: discussion of sa / csa and heavy use of terminology to describe the people who perpetuate that

I take an issue with the "ruling class" being dubbed "pxdo class" not because I don't think they are indeed rxpists and pxdophiles, but because of the implication.

As if it's only them and the majority of them who do it. As if the laws don't already favor rxpists regardless of their class. As if our parents, grandparents, siblings, aunts/uncles, their partners, and your partners arent also complicit and engaging in p*dophilia and rxpe.

There was an article here shared that read like it was written by a dude who has only now started to think about this topic, giving evolutionary reasons as to why "its the ruling class and not the lower class" who engages in pxdophilia (and I disagree with that assertion for multiple reasons.)

1.) The pillaging and ownership of bodies is essential to patriarchy, but is also the reward system in colonialism. This (sa/csa) is patriarchal (rooted in the nuclear family / enforced sex/gender binary) and colonialist violence (violence against those considered less than a person by the oppressor.)

2.) The reward for being a good lower-class worker bee is that you get your very own family to assault, to lie for you, and enable you.

3.) Those of us who have had the misfortune of engaging with the criminal "justice" system to punish our rxpists know that the courts will generally favor the rxpist or abuser, so it is no surprise to me that the rich also get away with their crimes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SerialExperimentsGay@hexbear.net 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's a jumping-off point, a way to get a wedge in, and i agree we should utilize the case to radicalize people, but you can only do that when you teach people that patriarchal capitalism isn't bad because of individual bad apples or a conspiracy of bad apples, but because patriarchy and capitalism are inherently unjust, exploitative machinations that will always favor the ruthless, egotistical, abusive elements in a society and elevate them to the top. That this is systemic and Epstein, Trump, Clinton, Gates, Mountbatton-Windsor and all the other scum were in that position because the system we labor under rewards scum, it will always reward scum and even in the rare cases were it doesn't protect its predatory elite it just replaces them with new predators unless we dismantle the system itself.

[–] ChaosMaterialist@hexbear.net 8 points 4 days ago

A good transition from Epstein to a general class analysis can start with how there is a double standard for justice; one for the Elite, and one for the rest of us. Liberals can easily see that. From there you can get to how laws are created by and for the same class, bailouts for corporations, enrichment schemes, etc, etc.