this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
785 points (98.8% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

15857 readers
154 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Hi!

Trans person here.

The answer to your question is no, there is no medical reason for the sex marker on the driver's license. (Nor would it make sense to carry a medical card with your assigned sex marker on it.)

Assigned sex at birth is rarely relevant in medical contexts, and in fact is probably misleading (causing doctors to inappropriately treat the patient based on their assigned sex rather than their actual biological characteristics).

A trans woman is truly more like a cis woman than a cis man when it comes to medical needs, e.g. she will need mammograms like cis women, and (assuming here that trans women are on estrogen) they metabolize drugs like cis women and almost all of their biology is not different from a cis woman who lacks a uterus and ovaries.

A study from Oct 2025 found that within 12 months of taking HRT, trans people have a heart mass that matches their gender:

The troponin threshold to predict cardiovascular events is lower for women due to the greater cardiac mass typically seen in men.

Since estradiol and testosterone were not thought to directly impact cardiac mass, researchers expected that troponin would remain similar to individuals’ assigned gender at birth.

However, they found the opposite to be true.

The clinical research team found that troponin levels shifted towards the affirmed gender after 12 months of hormone therapy.

Troponin decreased in transgender women to a level not statistically different from cisgender women, but which was 78% lower than in cisgender men.

Another recent study published in Oct 2025 found that on the molecular level hormones change the protein biomarkers in cells:

https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/study-finds-trans-womens-blood-proteins

“For transgender women, we found gender affirming hormone therapy alters the levels of many protein biomarkers,” Novakovic said, noting that this could impact risk assessments for things like autoimmune disease and heart conditions. Usually, these assessments factor in any number of variables, including sex as well as lifestyle or genetic components.

“Feminizing GAHT [gender-affirming hormone therapy] skews the plasma proteome toward a cis-female profile,” the study concluded. It should be noted that people of any sex or gender can exhibit a vast and evolving spectrum of these biomarkers—there is no “one size fits all” model for biodiversity.

The more evidence that is collected the more we realize that biological sex is not fixed but instead the human body is plastic and the sex really does change, so it's not really an exaggeration to say that trans women are biologically female in most medically relevant contexts.

The only exceptions I can think of are due to organs developing a certain way, e.g. trans men with a uterus still might technically have a rare chance of becoming pregnant or developing cervical cancers.

On the flip side, in rare cases, a trans woman (esp. one who transitions late and has a family history of prostate cancer) might develop a prostate cancer (fun fact: cis women have an organ similar to a prostate called the Skene's gland that, like the prostate, produces ejaculate; it's not a male-only organ), so that is one difference - trans women might need prostate exams that cis women wouldn't need.

But for almost all medical contexts, trans people should be treated as their gender and not their assigned sex at birth. For trans folks who have been on HRT for >6 - 12 months, it is genuinely a risk to their health to view them as their assigned sex at birth.

EDIT: for what it's worth, my doctor basically told me not to out myself to other doctors and this advice is not uncommonly given; he said the only thing I need to figure out in the future is possibly getting prostate exams when I'm much older - but even that is not clearly indicated given the treatment for prostate cancer is anti-androgens and estrogen, which I'll have been on for decades before the screening would start for prostate cancers; the needs vary, a woman who transitions later in life and has a family history of prostate cancer will have a different need for prostate cancer screening than a trans woman who transitioned before puberty and has no family history of prostate cancers, for example.

[–] multifariace@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Thank you for an amazing response! Perspective and sources. You're awesome.