this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
71 points (98.6% liked)
Slop.
804 readers
685 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That one never cleanly resolved from what I understand. Both subfactions hate people for their inheritance, make no mistake. But some of them are like "I cba to participate in your clown society, enjoy your wife who you hate" and the others are like "it's a good society but the clowns are in the way and influencing the cattle-people!" They want porn and hate porn respectively. The former is certainly not theory disciplined, the latter 99.9% of the time isn't either. Both, as recent evidence shows, are derivative of Epstein for some reason.
But you'll have a back and forth between the people who think you should be racist, jacked, innawoods with a virgin wife and the people who embody the smug pepe. They'll argue about whether women are tools or agents essentially. Actually, as I type it out, I think that's the core of the argument. "Are women making porn or are people making porn out of women?" and the conclusion sends them down the separate lanes of the same fucked up misogyny highway.
That's actually a great insight, I think you're onto something here.
the important thing is that in the second case, women are still not the victims of the porn industry, the porn watchers are the victims somehow, because they're getting brainwashed and wasting their breeding potential