this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
594 points (99.8% liked)

News

36118 readers
3092 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Agents with the FBI’s elite evidence response team were delayed in reaching the scene of a mass shooting at Brown University in December because there was no FBI plane available to take them to Rhode Island, according to three sources and a whistleblower’s account newly provided to Congress.

FBI Director Kash Patel was in south Florida at the time with one of the FBI’s two available jets and had given an order to hold the other for another team that would not normally respond to the scene, according to the whistleblower and the sources. The evidence response team instead had to drive through the night amid a snowstorm to reach the university in Providence, Rhode Island, by 9 o’clock the next morning, according to the whistleblower’s account..

An FBI spokesperson told MS NOW Tuesday he disputed the allegation that there were delays because of the director’s travels but said he would check into the matter more deeply to gather information.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

As I said. The conservatives. There isn't a non conservative party in the US, especially after the Clintons got done reforming the DNC.

You can try to "both parties the same," this shit, but history won't back you up. It has always been the far right pushing individual, rather than trained militia, ownership of guns, as well as pushing gun control while screaming that the more moderate conservatives were going to do what they were already doing.

Seems to be a pattern of projection there.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lol. Gun control got pushed when the Black Panthers advocated for legal possession, afaik.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That's when it got passed in California. Conservatives managed some gun control laws in a lot of other states prior and after that. The rich funded movement started getting pushed for as far back as The Business Plot. Again, please read your history. The rich literally declared war on the poor in Congress in the 1920s.

Wilson is arguably tied with Jackson for most damaging president to the US ever in the history of the US. And Jackson is barely hanging in there with the worst, deepest (by percentage of the GDP, not raw dollar amounts), longest depression in US history, caused partially, but it was the straw that broke the camel's back, by paying off the entirety of the national debt, and The Trail of Tears.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you're going that far, may as well start with Washington, as I said. And yes, it's both sides.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Then you literally can't start with Washington, as he was a vocal no party candidate, literally not officially running for office, and the last thing he said as the POTUS, while there were people begging him to NOT step down, was, "I sincerely hope and pray that The United States never engages in partisan politics, for if we do it will lead to the downfall of this potentially great democracy."

Jefferson and Madison would also be questionable there since they were actively pushing for more rights for the citizenry. Jefferson actively trying to prevent the "tyranny of ancestors," despite his questionable views, he failed but he tried. Madison meanwhile protested the "tyranny of the rich, privileged, and pirates." Madison just HATED pirates, and also had some questionable views.

Read your history. You have harmed yourself by not doing so.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah, Jefferson the slave owner who regularly raped his houseslave? Madison? I'm not sure who you think you're educating, or what Whitewashed history you'd have me read, but please, do continue. 😂

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, show your historical ignorance by framing people with your current understanding of morality. Jefferson was an abolishonist, or my ancestor would have lynched or shot him. Madison as well. Same for Washington, as I understand, though he never actually met my ancestor.

Try reading and understanding history. You are just showing that you are an uneducated reactionary authoritarian.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Non-sequiter. You have no arguments, just like the southern states. Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina are why we started the union as slave states, by only a single vote. The same states rejected the policies that the first 5 presidents and all northern senators supported that would have made this country the first democratic socialist country on earth in 1808.

Learn your history, or bless your heart, sweetie.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Edit: f what I just said. I return your blessing, packed down, shaken together, and running over, darling.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Projection at its finest. Typical.