this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
567 points (96.7% liked)
memes
20237 readers
1501 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Soviet architecture being like that has nothing to do with socialism and everything with authoritarianism. Just like everything else they did.
Soviet architecture is a byproduct of the material circumstances of the moment. The USSR industrialized at an unforeseen speed, took it less than 40 years to reach industrial maturity compared to 100-150 for Great Britain and Germany. They had to build housing for tens of millions of people in newly erected cities from scratch. They managed not only to do that, but to do it fairly, guaranteeing housing for everyone and eliminating homelessness, housing costing 3% of monthly income on average, and on top of that it was built in walkable neighborhoods with a wide variety of services nearby from stores to schools to medical care, and with top notch public transit and urban planning for the time, leaving space for green areas and playgrounds.
Nothing of that is authoritarian, you've been brainwashed by capitalism to hate socialism.
Socialism in the USSR stopped existing after the first elections they tried to hold. But it's not like you're going to engage in a good faith argument to begin with. Must feel nice to have a Good Camp that can do no wrong.
I gave you hard economic and historical data, what part of what I said is bad faith?
And what elections are you talking about, provisional government?
I'm critical of many aspects of Soviet socialism, not sure what you're talking about
"Hard economic and historical data" with no sources, that sure inspires confidence.
I'm talking about any elections they've held. You know, the ones where you were only allowed to vote for one party or fuck off.
I don't really see how it's possible to be critical of Soviet socialism without acknowledging Lenin ruined it the moment he decided to keep Bolsheviks in power.
Can't provide you the exact pages right now, but my sources are:
-Robert C. Allen's "Farm to Factory: a reinterpretation of the Soviet industrial revolution"
-Alec Nove's "An economic history of the Soviet Union"
-Albert Szymanski's "Human Rights in the Soviet Union" and "Is the red flag flying"
-A. Zveriev's "Lo que recibe el trabajador soviético además de su salario"
The equivalent of these people did not live in commie blocks either. The people who did still live in tenements or are straight up homeless.
Communist societies not having a large middle class is a different question though.
100%. They socialized the civic losses and sacrifices, and privatized the gains for their oligarchy.