this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
74 points (98.7% liked)

Canada

11702 readers
333 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Related Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
mp3@lemmy.ca
otter@piefed.ca
mp3@piefed.ca
74
An Alberta man wanted MAID. Instead, he died in a Catholic hospital, waiting to be transferred (www.cbc.ca)
submitted 2 weeks ago by HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works to c/canada@lemmy.ca
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

It’s September, and Stacey Hume is next to her dad’s hospital bed in the palliative ward of Edmonton’s Grey Nuns Community Hospital. She, along with her mom and sister, are told by staff that they need to make a choice about her dad.

Either contend with him possibly dying at a red light, alone in the ambulance, or remain in the hospital, where "it could be three, four or five more days of him hanging on like this," recalled Hume.

Her dad, William Hume, was dying. He had been diagnosed with late-stage gastroesophageal cancer just a few months earlier. William wanted MAID, and was assessed and approved soon after he was diagnosed.

But the procedure is prohibited at Grey Nuns, where William was admitted, as it was the only Edmonton hospital with an ER bed available. The hospital is operated by Covenant Health — a publicly funded, Catholic health-care provider in Alberta — which does not allow MAID to be administered at any of its sites. William would have to be transferred to another facility.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So, in Quebec, according to this article, they passed a law requiring facilities to let it happen on-site.

That's all that needs to happen, a hospital has any specific equipment on hand, and be willing to let in a doctor who is OK with it.

I agree with you, that no individual person should be forced to kill someone, but a hospital isn't a person and doesn't have feelings. There's a very reasonable chance someone works there who would have been OK with providing MAID, but doesn't, and even if 100% of the doctors there weren't OK with it, it's a lot simpler to have a doctor travel than it is to arrange a whole new bed, ambulance, on-site doctor, and family.

To me at least, that IS negligence. It's not a violation of any individual's beliefs that MAID happens in their general vicinity, and it's just not true that requiring a facility to allow it results in requiring individuals to perform it.

Also, less relevant, it's not necessarily that the vehicle can't keep the patient alive, it's just that there is a chance of the patient passing at any time, and that time might be during transport in an ambulance that is designed for emergencies first and doesn't accommodate families.

[–] No_Maines_Land@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, in my diagonal read, I don't think I captured that the facility was refusing MAID solely on religious grounds. That's not kosher.