this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
74 points (98.7% liked)

Canada

11696 readers
322 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Related Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
mp3@lemmy.ca
otter@piefed.ca
mp3@piefed.ca
74
An Alberta man wanted MAID. Instead, he died in a Catholic hospital, waiting to be transferred (www.cbc.ca)
submitted 2 weeks ago by HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works to c/canada@lemmy.ca
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

It’s September, and Stacey Hume is next to her dad’s hospital bed in the palliative ward of Edmonton’s Grey Nuns Community Hospital. She, along with her mom and sister, are told by staff that they need to make a choice about her dad.

Either contend with him possibly dying at a red light, alone in the ambulance, or remain in the hospital, where "it could be three, four or five more days of him hanging on like this," recalled Hume.

Her dad, William Hume, was dying. He had been diagnosed with late-stage gastroesophageal cancer just a few months earlier. William wanted MAID, and was assessed and approved soon after he was diagnosed.

But the procedure is prohibited at Grey Nuns, where William was admitted, as it was the only Edmonton hospital with an ER bed available. The hospital is operated by Covenant Health — a publicly funded, Catholic health-care provider in Alberta — which does not allow MAID to be administered at any of its sites. William would have to be transferred to another facility.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] No_Maines_Land@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I don't personally think any facility should be forced to provide MAID. Much as no individual staff should be requiredto. Rather the transfer protocols are what could use an update or spotlight.

Why must the patient be transfered with no family; particularly when it was not a time sensitive transfer? Why is the transfer vehcile unable to keep the patient alive for the journey; in this case it was an elective procedure, but that same failing would exist for a non-elective procude the hospital may be unable to treat?

I'm not a medical person, but my systems viewpoint is wondering what patient transfer is so precarious.

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So, in Quebec, according to this article, they passed a law requiring facilities to let it happen on-site.

That's all that needs to happen, a hospital has any specific equipment on hand, and be willing to let in a doctor who is OK with it.

I agree with you, that no individual person should be forced to kill someone, but a hospital isn't a person and doesn't have feelings. There's a very reasonable chance someone works there who would have been OK with providing MAID, but doesn't, and even if 100% of the doctors there weren't OK with it, it's a lot simpler to have a doctor travel than it is to arrange a whole new bed, ambulance, on-site doctor, and family.

To me at least, that IS negligence. It's not a violation of any individual's beliefs that MAID happens in their general vicinity, and it's just not true that requiring a facility to allow it results in requiring individuals to perform it.

Also, less relevant, it's not necessarily that the vehicle can't keep the patient alive, it's just that there is a chance of the patient passing at any time, and that time might be during transport in an ambulance that is designed for emergencies first and doesn't accommodate families.

[–] No_Maines_Land@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, in my diagonal read, I don't think I captured that the facility was refusing MAID solely on religious grounds. That's not kosher.

[–] GrindingGears@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's precarious because the ruling government has ruined it on purpose. They are trashing things and breaking systems literally on purpose, so they can rebuild everything in the christian heritage fascist vision they have cooked up in their minds. Once they force separation somehow, and of course they'll make sure the pockets of their supporters as well as their own will be lined with gold each step along the way.

Most Albertans stand by doing nothing while they do all of this. That's why this is happening, sorry for the long-winded explanation. Personally I think this is pretty cruel, whether you agree with MAID or not. Cruelty against its citizens also seems to be a key goal of the sitting government.

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Eh, I would say quite a lot of Albertans have done quite a bit. The protests, attempted recalls, and other attempts to get these maniacs out of our legislature are happening but... we're a little outnumbered and outfunded.

It would be a big help if we could ban foreign media conglomerates like Post Media from being the primary way 95% of our people got their "news" (ie propaganda propping up the traitors).

[–] GrindingGears@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

Add social media to that list, Facebook primarily. Reddit too. A lot of bot shit going on with both these platforms, really bad moderation and then the shit post media gets half their info and ideas from there. Bad recipe for sure.

[–] leastaction@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

The man was suffering unnecessarily and was not allowed to make a totally legal decision about his own body. The transfer system is what it is and it certainly wasn't going to change in the time he had left. Your "systems viewpoint" is irrelevant.