this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
291 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

81710 readers
3132 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Senate Bill 26-051 reflects that pattern. The bill does not directly regulate individual websites that publish adult or otherwise restricted content. Instead, it shifts responsibility to operating system providers and app distribution infrastructure.

Under the bill, an operating system provider would be required to collect a user’s date of birth or age information when an account is established. The provider would then generate an age bracket signal and make that signal available to developers through an application programming interface when an app is downloaded or accessed through a covered application store.

App developers, in turn, would be required to request and use that age bracket signal.

Rather than mandating that every website perform its own age verification check, the bill attempts to embed age attestation within the operating system account layer and have that classification flow through app store ecosystems.

The measure represents the latest iteration in a series of Colorado efforts that have struggled to balance child safety, privacy, feasibility and constitutional limits.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The best I could come up with is a separate instance of Pihole that any device my kids use is linked to.

It's a little clunky, but you can do this with one Pi-Hole instance by using the Groups feature. In the "Groups" tab take a group for your default Pi-Hole settings (or just use the already included Default group), and then make a separate group for the additional blocked domains for your children's devices (for purposes here we'll refer to this group as "Child"). In your Lists tab, choose which Group each list should be applied to (or choose the group it should be applied to while adding the entry). In your Clients tab use the drop down menu to choose and assign devices to Groups, put all your devices in the Default group and put all your children's devices in both the Default Group and the Child Group. This way your devices will have the default blocklists and your children's will have the default plus the additional blocklists aimed to protect them specifically.

[–] mrnngglry@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks for this! I’m still relatively new to Pi-Hole. I’ll give it a look.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

No problem, I've been using Pi-Hole for years but have only recently started exploring options with the Groups feature. In fact I spent a few minutes messing around with it before I wrote my original reply to make sure I was going to explain it right. Don't be afraid to hit me up with questions, I'd be happy to try to help.