this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2026
261 points (98.2% liked)

News

36063 readers
2959 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There's no evidence which demonstrates a causative link between decline in mental health and social media use in teens. It's all complete bullshit.

Oh yeah, no links of any kind.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2808593?guestAccessKey=59506bf3-55d0-4b5d-acd9-be89dfe5c45d

Those who had spent four or more hours with screens were 4.78 times more likely to have underdeveloped communication skills, 1.74 times more likely to have subpar fine motor skills and two times more likely to have underdeveloped personal and social skills by age 2. By age 4, risk remained only in the communication and problem-solving categories.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/21/health/screen-time-child-development-delays-risks-wellness

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885201423000242

Recommendations regarding screen-based media use.

Screen-based media use by young children – recommendations

Parents:

• No screen time for children younger than 2 years, with an exception of video chatting
• Minimize screen time for children 2–5 (max 1 h), providing alternative activities
• Avoid exposing children to background screens, e.g., by turning TV off if no one is watching or when child is present in the room
• Engage in co-viewing and mediating strategies, by e.g., creating rules on screen-time and which content is allowed to be viewed, explaining what is happening on the screen, asking questions about viewed content
• Select interactive media content and use media together with your child
• Avoid fast-paced programs and apps with highly distracting content, select programs that are not interrupted with commercials
• Screen media should not be used as means to calm children, with an exception of special times, e.g., during medical procedures or flights
• Use of screen-devices should be avoided by all family members during meal and playtimes, right before nap/bedtime, and during family gatherings
• Discuss any concerns regarding child screen-media use with healthcare providers
• Create a personalized media plan using a Family Media Plan platform developed by AAP with the help of a healthcare provider if necessary

... What, are you gonna say 'well thats young kids, not teens'... as if effects that start at an early age don't compound overtime with the same usage patterns?

You ever seen the videos of those kids that will scream and cry... untill the device is given back?

The pre-teens and tweens who will destroy a parent's car, knowing they are on camera, because they confiscated their device?

Sorry, but a whole lot of the root of this issue is parents who are utterly checked the fuck out.

Unless you're gonna propose regulating the ability to have a child, have the state raise these kids in lieu of the parents... everything else is just a bandaid.

The kind of fixes to society that would be required to address this in a non restrictive way would basically be: Fix the entire economy such that parents can afford to have time with their kids.

Mental health care availability?

Do Medicare for all first, then, maybe we can talk about that, otherwise, can't afford it, who cares.

Youth centers?

You seen how expensive cars are, how much debt people are in for them? Who can afford to drive the kids there and back, who has the time?

Your bandaid solutions are very far from being sufficient to address what is basically the total collapse of society.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago

Sorry, but a whole lot of the root of this issue is parents who are utterly checked the fuck out.

Yes, exactly, and that is why these new laws restricting social media access for people under 16 will do nothing to help the situation and take away the rights of a minority group for no gain.

That is my entire point. It does not solve the problems at all. My "bandaid fixes" aren't proposals, they are examples of things someone would do if they actually wanted to solve the problem. The fact that those options are being ignored and the only policy being installed is censorship should tell you everything you need to know about the policy. It isn't even INTENDED to help.

I am 100% on board with the abolition of capitalism. You are arguing with someone who already agrees with you. I have been advocating for the abolition of capitalism for over ten years.