this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2026
950 points (97.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

10937 readers
1474 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mushroomman_toad@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The annoying thing though is that all the random blogs on the web are written with using these LLMs now. It makes it much harder to be critical of your sources, because they're all coming from a unnamed, proprietary LLM with no information about who owns it or the training data. At least before, I could look up the user or check out their other articles, now every article is randomly generated from some unknown prompt.

[–] ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I would argue this isn't only a bad thing though. Even before AI, many bogus articles and information existed. Eg. that people swallow spiders in their sleep, which many outlets parroted.

I would guess most people never checked (m)any sources on most information they found so long as the 'vibe' felt trustworthy. There is no cure to make reality simple, and the more pressure we have to teach people to think critically, the better.

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
  1. AI is much better at creating internet spam.
  2. AI is a vector for even reputable places to "set and forget" any article they're in charge of. Any mistruths are simply 'glitches'.
  3. The pressure on people to think critically only matters if people actually start thinking critically. Kids use this technology to skip their homework.
[–] ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

No disagreement here. I'm simply saying because you are more likely to be misled now than ever, being lazy about it isn't an option anymore, and teachers can use that fact to drive the point home stronger. In the past if you were lazy about checking sources and verifying information, chances were much higher you got valid information that didn't harm your life down the road. Now you might just hurt yourself by putting glue on your pizza. Not saying I desire that, but the consequences of intellectual laziness have never been bigger, so the emphasis on understanding must follow, since the alternative is being taken advantage of.

#3 is very important, as this is the core thing a school should teach. But lets not kid ourselves that kids weren't cheating their way out of homework since the start of time 😄

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

But lets not kid ourselves that kids weren't cheating their way out of homework since the start of time 😄

I don't mean to come off as too aggressive because I don't think we're really arguing with each other. But, I tend to see statements like this as a kind of handwaving apologia for something that, to be clear, real people are doing to us on purpose. The same way that people might lament the coming of a hurricane season; nothing really to be done about it.

[–] ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

It can certainly be used for that, I will admit. But no that isn't my intention. I hear many good stories on that front of teachers that have gotten a really good nose for AI and are using it as learning moments for their students. The world is filled with ways to cheat, and teachers are well aware of that. In the end, the process to unlearn them from cheating with AI is the same as cheating in conventional manners, is all I'm saying.