this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
443 points (99.3% liked)

Not The Onion

20512 readers
1218 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A couple were told they faced a $200,000 (£146,500) medical bill when their baby was born prematurely in the US, despite them having travel insurance which covered her pregnancy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 137 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Their baby was born in an American hospital seven weeks early, but the couple said Zurich Insurance Group refused to uphold the policy and cover their costs because the baby was not named in the document.

After a nine month legal battle, Zurich has reversed its decision and told the BBC it was sorry for the stress caused.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 87 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The unborn child that isn't allowed to have a name yet needs to be named in the document.

[–] albbi@piefed.ca 25 points 12 hours ago

You can just imagine whoever made that decision letting out an evil laugh.

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 77 points 15 hours ago

The legal proceedings had more time to mature than the baby lol