this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
355 points (96.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

40703 readers
1108 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deHaga@feddit.uk 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm not saying don't regulate.

I would much rather have the government stiffle innovation if that means that consumer are safe and benefit from said innovation.

How can they benefit from innovation that has been stifled?

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

How can they benefit from innovation that has been stifled?

a) how are you measuring "innovation"?

b) how are you measuring the "benefit", and for who?

Regulations and standardization can hold back an existing company from trying a new idea, however, they are also the only thing that creates true, lasting, interoperability, and interoperability is what let's new companies enter markets.

i.e. Theoretically, Apple may be held back if they want to innovate their charging port because they have to make it compatible with USB-C.

However, now new companies that aren't apple that want to innovate on cables and chargers can enter the market, and they'll benefit from a consistent specified interface and not having to design a million proprietary variants, and they'll be able to plan their products in a stabler, longer term environment, that will make it easier to attract investment.

[–] deHaga@feddit.uk 1 points 11 hours ago

how are you measuring "innovation"?

Patents, breakthroughs. Most happen in US or China.

No risk, no reward.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Stifle wasn't the right word. Sorry about that, I wrote my comment too fast amd English isn't my first language.

Innovation isn't an all or nothing thing.

There is a difference between removing all the red tape and saying "fuck it" and making sure that the said innovation isn't outright dangerous. If we need to take thing slower to make sure that people aren't killed directly or indirectly, then so be it.

[–] deHaga@feddit.uk -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If we burn the planet for more economic productivity, we made more money but made human life worst.

So what is the point of economic productivity if it makes our everyday live worst?

[–] deHaga@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

It needs to be sustainable obviously

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How can they benefit from innovation that has been stifled?

If the innovation is a more efficient way to your toe

[–] deHaga@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

Stifled innovation means a loss of competitive advantage.