this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
941 points (98.3% liked)

Funny

15017 readers
268 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah. Wars weren't fought because a king had a temper tantrum. Wars were mostly fought to control land.

This is mistaking cause and effect. Fighting over land results in a lot of strong emotions. Emotions aren't the cause of fighting over land.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago

I mean the War of the Roses was fought initially for resources/control, but began to become more about settling bitter feuds than economic gain. But I see these as exceptions

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It is, though, compromise and negotiation would be the healthy way to deal with these things, fighting over them is a failure of emotional control, it’s required by at least one side of those kinds of conflicts. And many a war was indeed fought due to kings having temper tantrums.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If your army can easily crush the enemy and they refuse to give you the resources you want, it's not an emotional decision to go to war to get it. It might be an immoral one, but so is demanding the resources in the first place.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

You really see that as the healthy way to deal with these kinds of situations? Building an army and crushing all who cannot stand against you so that you can take what they have and force your control over them?

Telling. Very telling.

Immoral = emotionally unhealthy.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's very telling that you think emotion has anything to do with it.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

A better question is: what caused the dispute in the first place? Who the true aggressor?

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You’re letting us know a lot about yourself there.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're letting us know a lot about you here.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, like how I’m not a fucking sociopath.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I dunno, not being able to see the humanity of other people is worrying.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, that’s what I was pointing put the entire time.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Exactly, so you are a sociopath.