this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
862 points (98.8% liked)

Funny

13830 readers
1823 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 8 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

*a few. I like to believe wars were fought more over resource domineering than ideology or emotion

Otherwise jesus are we lost as a species

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah. Wars weren't fought because a king had a temper tantrum. Wars were mostly fought to control land.

This is mistaking cause and effect. Fighting over land results in a lot of strong emotions. Emotions aren't the cause of fighting over land.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 3 points 12 hours ago

I mean the War of the Roses was fought initially for resources/control, but began to become more about settling bitter feuds than economic gain. But I see these as exceptions