this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
134 points (99.3% liked)
History Memes
2306 readers
4 users here now
A place to share history memes!
Rules:
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.
-
No fascism (including tankies/red fash), atrocity denial or apologia, etc.
-
Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.
-
Follow all Piefed.social rules.
-
History referenced must be 20+ years old.
Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world
OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:
- !historymusic@quokk.au
- !historygallery@quokk.au
- !historyruins@piefed.social
- !historyart@piefed.social
- !historyartifacts@piefed.social
- !historyphotos@piefed.social
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Explanation: There's a common story that during British rule of India, some local Brit officials got the bright idea to reduce the (legitimately deadly) cobra population. Of course, they wouldn't do it themselves - that would be dangerous! Rather, they decided to pay a bounty to people for each dead cobra turned in! Why didn't Indians just think of this before?
... after some time of paying out bounties but cobra attacks not dropping, it came to the Brits' attention that people were just farming cobras and turning them in. Thus, the bounty was rescinded... and the farmed cobras, no longer useful, released... causing cobra attacks to go up.
This is often cited as a classic example of 'perverse incentives' in economics - when the trigger for an economic incentive can be easily taken advantage of in a counterproductive way.
Perverse incentives is a concept I'm going to think about a lot today.
What is the most effective way to counter bad-faith exploitation of a system that is intended to fix a problem?
I feel like this kind of issue is very prevalent today, opportunistic grifting that hurts communities when the original intent is discarded for greed?
It's a very delicate balance. If your prevention is too robust, you can end up with a system that causes more damage than the problem it 'solves'. If your prevention isn't robust enough... cobras. Everywhere.
Luckily, as it is a recognized concept that is widely taught nowadays, we can rest easy knowing that any new systems implemented will not be ignorant of the concept of perverse incentives, just consciously disregarding all the boring eggheads who ring the alarm on the system's first drafts.
See AXS
See Ticketmaster
See US politics
Yeah, the actual solution is to create some entity responsible for reducing the threat, rather than attempting to avoid the administrative work by creating a lazy-ass bounty program.
Same issue with capitalism. Attempting to reduce the administration of dealing with a societal issue by foisting the work off onto people by promising them profits just makes everything worse.
Bounty programs can be cost-effective sometimes, but they are a very blunt weapon effective on only the broadest and most indelicate of problems.