this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
387 points (99.5% liked)
United States | News & Politics
8959 readers
602 users here now
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Same game as the 2008 economic crash. They could have bailed out the mortgage holders...but instead, they bailed out the lenders. The banks would have gotten paid either way, but instead of helping regular people...they just gave the money directly to the banks.
Good news is they learned from that, there will be no more bail outs.
Not because they change the system. They didn't so this scam will repeat itself.
They (and our EU vazal 'leaders') decided to create a bail-in law.
Next time they can legally and instantly steal everything above a certain amount from everyone's account.
The iron law is that money flows to the top.
2008 didn‘t damage mortage holders, how did you get to this opinion? Banks were packaging bad credits with good ones an shifting those packages like hot potatoes between each other. Till it crashed.
You don't remember them crashing the entire economy?
800 euro per European we had to pay for these scammers.
Yes. That’s a different case to todays case. People should‘ve been bailed out. Trump used his powers wrong and thus the paid tariffs have to be paid back to the importer. If the importer give this back to customers is a different question. Everybody should speak to Walmart et. al. about a this.
Because these companies have ALWAYS responded positively to consumers wishes, its why prices are so low and why we're in a golden age of national production, instead of paying companies to ship products from one country, where they're farmed, to another country to be processed, then another country to be packaged, and finally to their destination where they're sold.
They were also offering sub-prime mortgages with extra long amortization terms to people who wouldn't have otherwise qualified for a mortgage. It was basically on-par with pay-day loan scams. That's what they were shifting around...the debts those people owed.
They were all thrown under the bus, so the lenders could make fast cash selling that debt amongst themselves, and then get bailed out by the government when that debt collapsed.
Instead of giving the default money to banks they could have given it to the "bad credit" mortgage holders, who could have used it to pay their mortgages. The money still goes to banks but people get houses too.
But greed demands they own the debt and the house after taking all the money first. Corpos gotta really squeeeeeze to get that last drop.