this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
372 points (99.5% liked)

News

35962 readers
2936 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Bill Gates has pulled out of a keynote address at the AI Impact Summit in India as he continues to face questions over his relationship with the deceased child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

The billionaire Microsoft co-founder travelled to India, where his foundation works with the government on delivering AI for social good, earlier this week and was advertised as speaking at the international summit shortly after the country’s prime minister, Narendra Modi.

But Gates suddenly withdrew on Thursday morning, hours before he was due to address delegates, including the French president, Emmanuel Macron, and India’s richest man, Mukesh Ambani.

The Gates Foundation said in a statement: “After careful consideration and to ensure the focus remains on the AI summit’s key priorities, Mr Gates will not be delivering his keynote address..”

The move came less than 48 hours after the Gates Foundation had insisted: “Bill Gates is attending the AI Impact Summit. He will be delivering his keynote as scheduled.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NGC2346@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago (3 children)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 14 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Funny how as cameras are everywhere and 4K, evidence seems to alway be blurry. Pretty hard at that distance to have that shallow a DOF. Slop.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 2 points 10 hours ago

Resolution has little to do with blurriness.

I can grab a 200MP sensor with the best lens systems and autofocus algorithms, and you'll still take blurry pictures.

Shutter speed, steady hands, and the relative radial movement speed of the object compared to the camera is what matters.

Now, imagine this: you're a tourist, with an average phone. Say, an iPhone 16 Pro Max. You spot a guy that looks like Epstein, from across the road or even a plaza. He's walking away so you have seconds to: pull your phone out, open the camera, zoom in, focus on the face and take photos. How will those photos turn out?

I mean you can literally try this yourself by going out into public and replicating the circumstances. Target must be at least 20-30 meters away, and you're starting from a resting position (not phone in hand, camera open, ready to shoot, that's not life-like). Unless you're a pro photographer... those photos will turn out blurry.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 6 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

It doesn’t make any sense. Why keep him alive as a liability? Even in the most wild conspiracy scenarios, doesn’t killing him make the most sense?

Why should anyone believe that this, the idea that he’s alive, isn’t a distraction from the actual details which matter?

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 5 points 10 hours ago

Not really a liability. A friend. Fake his death, put him away in a different country where he won't be recognised, add some basic plastic surgery, a beard, long hair, and bam you just got away with decades of crime.

[–] NGC2346@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 hours ago

Sure, what my eyes see here make absolutely no sense. Should i also believe earth is flat and that the government wants the best for me ?

[–] BillyTheKid@lemmy.ca -1 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Because they don't really care. They know a lot of us know, and they know we won't do anything because enough people believe what they're told.

The dead body's ear didn't match the living ear.

His online accounts were active after he supposedly died.

He was literally part of a global conspiracy.

His private plane went on a long flight after he supposedly died.

It's reasonable to believe he's alive. No hard evidence, though.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

The online account things were shown to be untrue.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Well, your photos should certainly be hard evidence. What’s the source on those, so they can be vetted a little deeper?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

your photos should certainly be hard evidence.

It's 2026, any photos not on film are suspect.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

The chin looks way wrong for it to be the same guy as does the area between the orbital/cheek bone and the ear. Epstein has a very weird jaw structure and even a beard would be difficult to hide it under. The dudes face would need to be almost a full inch longer.

Could be reconstructive surgery but if that's the case why not go further?

Fun pics though.