this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
409 points (99.5% liked)

News

35962 readers
2919 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Bill Gates has pulled out of a keynote address at the AI Impact Summit in India as he continues to face questions over his relationship with the deceased child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

The billionaire Microsoft co-founder travelled to India, where his foundation works with the government on delivering AI for social good, earlier this week and was advertised as speaking at the international summit shortly after the country’s prime minister, Narendra Modi.

But Gates suddenly withdrew on Thursday morning, hours before he was due to address delegates, including the French president, Emmanuel Macron, and India’s richest man, Mukesh Ambani.

The Gates Foundation said in a statement: “After careful consideration and to ensure the focus remains on the AI summit’s key priorities, Mr Gates will not be delivering his keynote address..”

The move came less than 48 hours after the Gates Foundation had insisted: “Bill Gates is attending the AI Impact Summit. He will be delivering his keynote as scheduled.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 40 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Read the files. Ole Bill caught VD from the Island and asked Epstein how to secretly dose Melinda with antibiotics. She divorced him when she realized he gave her VD. Before that, she was fine with Epstein.

[–] sakuraba@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

man i was so confused by VD this VD that... VENEREAL DESEASE that's it! or even better!! say STI or STD!

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

STD is in a similar category: it’s an old term that’s no longer used because it’s inaccurate and misleading

but otherwise, yes: STI is the correct term

[–] sakuraba@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

thanks for the info, it's just funny to me that STD was already an old and incorrect term but it still would be better than VD because at least I'm familiar with that abbreviation

[–] nwtreeoctopus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

"VD" feels like WWII era shit.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 29 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

She might have been willfully ignorant to to that point. Once she had evidence she couldn't pretend to ignore she finally acted.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 17 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I saw reports that she spoke to at least one of the girls during her visit, wondering why she was there. So at best she stayed silent about the crimes she knew was happening.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 9 hours ago

Silence, something about silence makes me sick 'Cause silence can be violent sorta like a slit wrist

Rage Against the Machine - Fistful of Steel

If Melinda Gates stayed silent about the abuse on Epstein Island than she's complict in the abuse.

[–] BillyTheKid@lemmy.ca 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Not that it makes it okay, but I'm certain she has tons of non-disclosures she signed in the divorce.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 8 hours ago

Which is worse. The most likely deal was "Sign these NDAs Melinda and you'll get access to your husband's wealth in the divorce".

This means she willingly choose wealth over exposing more abuse.

[–] waddle_dee@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Once she was actually affected by it all, she left. She was fine trucking along until then.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Humans jump through hoops to try and rationalize the bad acts of the people they like. Oftentimes that's what it takes for them to finely admit it to themselves. What's maybe even more important is what you do next. She has the resources to stand up with the victims, but she chose to remain silent.

[–] waddle_dee@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

I wholeheartedly agree. Love makes people do funny things, but this feels different. I can see looking pass a lot of horrific things, I have a family of abuse. But the magnificence of this cannot and should not be dismissed. She had to have known the scale at which this was taking place, and to not do a bloody thing is telling.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 16 hours ago

She thought Epstein was about investments, but I'm not buying that.