Progressive Politics

4150 readers

685 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TokenBoomer@lemmy.world

114

Bernie Sanders and Gavin Newsom become adversaries over push to tax California billionaires (apnews.com)

submitted 3 days ago by geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

LOS ANGELES (AP) — As national Democrats search for a unifying theme ahead of the fall’s midterm elections, a California proposal to levy a hefty tax on billionaires is turning some of the party’s leading figures into adversaries just when Democrats can least afford division from within.

Bernie Sanders will be in Los Angeles campaigning Wednesday for the tax proposal that has the Silicon Valley in an uproar, with tech titans are threatening to leave the state. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom is among its outspoken opponents, warning that it could leave government finances in crisis and put the state at a competitive disadvantage nationally.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 46 points 3 days ago (7 children)

This is why Democrats will keep losing. Newsom stands up for the rich, while Bernie stands up for the rest of us. In the end, the DNC will choose Newsom as their candidate.

...and that's how we'll get JD Vance for president in 2028.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Vance doesn’t have a chance bro, don’t worry about that.

Tucker Carlson and MTG, however…look out for those two. If/when the DNC anoint Newsom, they will join the race to trounce him.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Tucker, maybe, but not MTG. They would never vote for a woman. She might menstruate all over the nukes or something. I forget their exact reasoning.

load more comments (5 replies)