this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
23 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

6522 readers
336 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I agree that schools should pay for it, but not that they should be ditched.

I didnt realise how rich some of my friends were until I went to their house. The uniform made us all equals in the classroom

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There was no doubt in my school in NZ who was poor and who wasn't, based on how someone's clothes fit them or how worn they were. The youngest in a poor family would have some very worn clothes that had been passed down from their siblings. Often 2 sizes too big or too small.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

right, which is a real issue for the parents having to buy the uniforms every year. Im wishing for an ideal scenario where the school is tasked with trading in/out uniforms year after year and the parents just wash them

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Will not stop wealthy parents buying new.

Will just take burden of poor while continuing to hilight the difference in quality.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago

I agree it wont place a top cap on wealth displays, but it will raise the bottom cap

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

If the school are providing it then that sets a lower floor for how bad it can be. Currently poor kids will just keep wearing it until there are too many holes for it to work as clothing or they run out of siblings to pass it down to.

[–] thehatfox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I didnt realise how rich some of my friends were until I went to their house. The uniform made us all equals in the classroom

Uniforms have never done that in my experience, because there are plenty of wealth signifiers outside of uniforms kids will still notice (pencil cases, bags, PE trainers, mobile phones etc), and even the uniforms themselves are not worn equally. The rich kids have clean uniforms that get regular replaced each term, the poor ones had dirty and ill fitting hand-me-downs.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes but these will be minor differences (check out my clean school mandated tennis shoes) as opposed to major ones (check out my £3,000 nikes)

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can you even tell the difference between a $50 pair of shoes from $3k? I sure cant.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

i cant either, but my 16 year old material obsessed cousin definitely can, and he's way more representative of the population than I am