this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
22 points (100.0% liked)
Privacy
4025 readers
98 users here now
Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah I did, I watched the talk and read the article before I posted. I understand that the article calls out several times "email is fine actually", but I'm not under any delusions that Delta Chat is using "traditional email", which is what the article spends the most time debunking. The article's points on stubbornly using email technology were "countries have a harder time blocking it" (which I mainly focused on) and "email servers are battle-tested". I'm not counting the second point as worth talking about since it's kind of dumb to imply that there's no possible way to have more efficient communication relays than pre-existing email servers, and they're already modifying those email servers to fit their own purposes anyway so that removes the "battle-tested" perk.
Alright, so from my personal experience (a bit like you, not an expert on Delta Chat or Simplex)
I tried Simplex recently, and I found the user experience a bit confusing. The chatrooms I was part of were quite verbose, and in one of those rooms people were mentioning the battery drain that simplex can create. I also wasn't able to connect to the SimpleX client on Linux for some reasons.
DeltaChat on the other hand is really newbie friendly. You just set your username, and they take care of the rest for you. You can still connect other devices, and even change servers without encryption getting in the way (imagine the opposite of the way Matrix does things)
I see your point about "why use email if you have to reengineer it anyway?", but if we look at other messenging alternatives:
None of them was really convincing either even starting from scratch.
That being said, if you like SimpleX, then it's probably the best for you. I like Deltachat because it was easy to convert my family to it, something I never really managed to do with any of the other alternatives.
It makes sense to want to use Delta Chat because of the UX right now, but I'm just assuming the UX on all of these projects is bad in some way, and I'm assuming there are improvements to be made in other regards as well (Delta Chat is only recently trying to land Perfect Forward Secrecy, for example). I'm more concerned with looking at the future trajectories of these projects, as someone who has had to convert their friend group between solutions multiple times and is sick of projects that don't go anywhere or will get superseded by projects with better designs.
With that in mind, I'm mainly looking at the fundamentals of the implementation and if, given enough community support/money, all the UX issues could be solved eventually. Even projects like Matrix, which sucks for a few big reasons right now, could still be mostly fixed up with enough effort. My suspicion is that "fixing up" Delta Chat would realistically mean that they should move away from emails as part of their stack, unless there is some actual value-add from keeping it.
(For the record my friends and I are using Signal currently. I played around with SimpleX a long time ago but found the UX lacking for normies.)
We're on the same boad.
I've been following Matrix since the Riot.im days. Today, Element X is still incomplete. I'm not sure they can even achieve what they should. XMPP is a bit similar. It has been years, and still the experience is supbar.
They kind of already do. That's what chatmail servers are: https://github.com/chatmail/relay
I am also on Signal with some of my friends, but Signal's lack of communities features ( https://community.signalusers.org/t/communities-with-sub-groups/43783 ) is what is truly lacking compared to Whatsapp.