this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
349 points (98.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

29749 readers
232 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xep@discuss.online 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The worst DB in existence, not to defend Oracle, is blockchain.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

y'all wrong, the worst database in existence is wherever I keep my notes. because every time I write notes I forget where the fuck I wrote them.

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Isn't it how all the databases work? Or maybe you should just enable cache for yours.

can't cache my notes because I forgot where I put my notebook

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Based on what? It’s top notch for immutability, zero trust, proof of existence, accountability, transparency, uptime, decentralization, network resilience…

[–] chaospatterns@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

What about throughput, latency, schema modeling, query load balancing/routing, confidentiality, regulatory compliance, operational tooling? How easily can I write a CRUD or line of business service using it?

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Confidentiality, regulatory compliance, schema modeling (IDLs?), query load balancing (rpc infra) and operational tooling pretty good in my world now (Solana). Throughout and latency decent now (400ms conf, couple second finality, 4k tps) but obviously the type of system that needs a trustless immutable database has tradeoffs.

How easily can you write a crud system? No clue that’s on you. A line of business service? Why the hell would that need a trustless immutable ledger. You’re barking up the wrong tree. Low level financial systems are pretty much the only thing that benefits. Small niche for proof of existence perhaps. And maybe other immutable use case things.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Blockchain isn't a Database, and the worst one is AS400.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

A400 is at least relational.

MongoDB on the other hand...

All data is, or will become, relational.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I am a big SQL fan but not all data has to be relational.

Let’s say I want the GPS coordinates of ten million vehicles every 5 seconds. I have a vehicle id, a timestamp, and coordinates. I do not care if a few writes get lost. Why does this have to be relational?

And perhaps I also record other info that may change from vehicle to vehicle. Perhaps just values that are true if present. DoorOpen, BrakeApplied, LightsOn, LightBarOn, EngineOn, etc. I may only be displaying this data in a UI. I may get different values from every vehicle or even every write. There is no “schema”. I mean, I can have a JSON field or something in my relational table? But this is not exactly relational anymore.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 0 points 5 hours ago

Correct not all data has to be relational but it will always eventually become relational. You will at one point want to pair that vehicle id to a vehicle and then again to something else.