this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
810 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

81078 readers
4020 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Super Bowl ad for Ring security cameras boasting how the company can scan neighborhoods for missing dogs has prompted some customers to remove or even destroy their cameras.

Online, videos of people removing or destroying their Ring cameras have gone viral. One video posted by Seattle-based artist Maggie Butler shows her pulling off her porch-facing camera and flipping it the middle finger.

Butler explained that she originally bought the camera to protect against package thefts, but decided the pet-tracking system raised too many concerns about government access to data.

"They aren't just tracking lost dogs, they're tracking you and your neighbors," Butler said in the video that has more than 3.2 million views.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 81 points 22 hours ago (7 children)

the problem with these fucking things is that you can't really opt out. even if you don't buy your own, some neighbours will happily buy and install the big brother to watch you from their porch and there is very little you can do about it.

same as you can't really escape the google, even if you don't use single one of their service, there is always the other part to any communication you are having...

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 1 points 5 hours ago

Most of them you can disable with DEAUTHs. Wifi cameras are a stupid concept.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

In Belgium, it is legally required to put a sign up if you have cameras, you can't point them at a place including public properties IIRC, and you can force them via the local government to move the camera if they are pointing at your property (at least in theory).

Lasers. Blue lasers are what you can do. https://www.reddit.com/r/Ring/comments/wqxkdq/what_is_this_person_doing_to_my_camera/ (hate to link to reddit but it is a good demo)

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 1 points 5 hours ago

And DEAUTH attacks. Because they're all dumb wifi cameras. You can keep them jammed and destroy them while they can't upload footage.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

it is similar here in czechia, at least in theory, but the theory will always differ from real life.

you first have to know there is a camera to identify the problem, then if you are in doubt... i don't know, sue them to prove that camera does not capture your property?

it would take few years, because the justice system here works on geological scales. and before you would get any reasonable result, billion other cameras would pop up meantime.

[–] ragas@lemmy.ml 3 points 12 hours ago

Where I live, you can sue if the camera films more than their own property.

[–] johntash@eviltoast.org 6 points 17 hours ago

Maybe we all need to start wearing clothes with bright infrared leds lining them?

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 20 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. I never used Gemini or gave sensitive information/photos to major AI companies, but my family has, including photos of me.

[–] Pupscent@lemmy.ca 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I've never had a Facebook account. I've always hated when people posted pictures I was in and said who I was.

[–] SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 18 hours ago

Meta algorithms have ghost profiles, including dead people or babies not yet born

[–] jambudz@lemmy.zip 4 points 20 hours ago (2 children)
[–] redsand@infosec.pub 1 points 5 hours ago

DEAUTH for a couple days and shoot the lens with a laser. They'll never figure it out.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 4 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

break it and be recorded on their camera breaking it. that will end well.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Tell me without telling me that you've never needed the police to do anything useful.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Are you kidding? Police LOVE investigating petty vandalism. Almost as much as DAs love prosecuting them! Top priority. Clearance rates are very high. You may have to call them 2 or three times before sleepy fatass deputy (who it too stupid to do anything else) will come and take make a report but trust me, they really do care, and will stop at nothing to achieve justice for your spy gadget.

Half the prison population in US are people who drew swastikas on Teslas.

Fear not! Your doorbell will be avenged!

[–] jambudz@lemmy.zip -2 points 19 hours ago

You can’t put a mask on and cover your distinguishing features? Weak

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

IR LEDs don't work on these like with some CCTV cameras, right?

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 8 points 21 hours ago

At close range they'll blind them, but the tech is getting better these days.

What knocks out the camera is the auto exposure, they used to just take the whole sensors input, average it and set the brightness against that value. A lot of the newer surveillance cameras will just ignore the overall and compensate pixel per pixel.

Project farm looked at a bunch

https://youtu.be/j0GZKXWf3vg?t=749