this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
29 points (93.9% liked)

Electric Vehicles

2390 readers
24 users here now

Overview:

Electric Vehicles are a key part of our tomorrow and how we get there. If we can get all the fossil fuel vehicles off our roads, out of our seas and out of our skies, we'll have a much better environment. This community is where we discuss the various different vehicles and news stories regarding electric transportation.


Related communities:


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

BYD used the ad to offer buyers up to €10,000 ($11,800) to those who bought a car and traded in a vehicle with a wet timing belt. That just happens to describe the timing system used in Stellantis’ PureTech engines, which run belts through a constant oil bath. These engines have been at the center of several recalls and warranty extensions linked to long-term reliability issues.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (14 children)

The IAP ruled that these messages violated Italian advertising rules against defamation, misleading commercial communication, and unfair comparative advertising.

Good call by the Italian authorities, I admit the way BYD did it as a trade-in offer is pretty clever, but comparative advertising is near impossible to do legally in EU exactly for the reasons stated. It will almost always be unfair and misleading, as it focus on features that disfavor the competition. This can quickly become an issue of actual defamation.

On another note, Chinese car makers can apparently make deals with EU for lower tariffs if they promise to not sell their cars too cheap. But how does that work when they make attractive trade-in offers?

[–] dupelet_comments@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago (13 children)

How is it defamation if it's true?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Obviously if it's true it is not defamation what I wrote was:

This can quickly become an issue of actual defamation.

This can be by context, for instance only mentioning bad aspects or anecdotal evidence.

Yes, but the ruling stated that they violated defamation rules, which implies defamation did happen.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)